Exploration of the Effects of Telerehabilitation in a School-Based Setting for At-Risk Youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6215Abstract
This study explored the efficacy and feasibility of a motion-capture program that may be utilized for telerehabilitation purposes. Two children attending a school for at-risk children received 20 sessions of Timocco, with sessions lasting for 30 minutes, under the guidance of research assistants. The researchers employed a mixed methods design to analyze quantitative data and qualitative interviews. Both children improved their fine and gross motor coordination, as measured on the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Short Form. To explore feasibly, qualitative verbal reports of the child participants and research assistants were obtained. The children and research assistants reported positive experiences with the utilization of this platform. A collaborative, consultative telerehabilitation model may be a promising delivery mode of services for improving motor skills in children, with frequent input from the child, aide or teacher, and clinician. Further exploration is needed for telerehabilitative service delivery for at-risk children.
References
Ashburner, J., Vickerstaff, S., Beetge, J., & Copley, J. (2016). Remote versus face-to-face delivery of early intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: Perceptions of rural families and service providers. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 1-14.
Ahn, J. (2011). Policy, technology, and practice in cyber charter schools: Framing the issues. Teachers College Record, 113(1), 1-26. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2331/add6d9f576ffba54261ff6f81d4d423b59cf.pdf
Bruininks, R.H., & Bruininks, D.B. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (2nd ed.). Pearson: Minneapolis, MN.
Christina Seix Academy. (2016). Inquire online. Retrieved from http://christinaseixacademy.org/inquire-online
Ciccia, A.H., Whitford, B., Krumm, M., & McNeal, K. (2011). Improving the access of young urban children to speech, language and hearing screening via telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17, 240-244. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1258/jtt.2011.100810
Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2094-2103.
Criss, M. (2013). School-based telerehabilitation in occupational therapy: Using telerehabilitation technologies to promote improvements in student performance. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(1), 39-46. http://telerehab.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/Telerehab/article/view/6115
Davis, T. L., Kerr, B. A., & Robinson Kurpius, S. E. (2003). Meaning, purpose, and religiosity in at-risk youth: The relationship between anxiety and spirituality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 356–365. http://journals.biola.edu/jpt/volumes/31/issues/4/articles/356
Donica, D.K. (2015). Handwriting without Tears®: General education effectiveness through a consultative approach. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 1-8. http://ajot.aota.org/article.aspx?articleid=2465083
Doran, P.R. (2013). Parentally placed students in private schools: A brief review of United States policy and practice. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 14(1), 79-86. https://www.academia.edu/11713433/Parentally Placed_Students_in_Private_Schools_A_Brief_Review_of_United_States_Policy_and_Practice
Gibbs, V., & Toth-Cohen, S. (2011). Family-centered occupational therapy and telerehabilitation for children with autism spectrum disorders. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 25, 298-314. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/07380577.2011.606460?journalCode=iohc20
Golomb, M., McDonald, B., Warden, S., Yonkman, J., Saykin, A., Shirley, B., & Burdea, G. (2010). In-home virtual reality videogame telerehabilitation in adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1-19.
http://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993(09)00817-X/pdf
Ingersoll, B., Wainer, A.L., Berger, N.I., Pickard, K.E., & Bonter, N. (2016). Comparison of a self-directed and therapist-assisted telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD: A Pilot RCT. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2275–2284. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10803-016-2755-z
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26-38.
Schein, R., Schmeler, R., Saptono, A., & Brienza, D. (2010). Patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation assessments for wheeled mobility and seating. Assistive Technology, 22, 215-222.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10400435.2010.518579
Tsaousides, T., D'Antonio, E., Varbanova, V., & Spielman, L. (2014). Delivering group treatment via videoconference to individuals with traumatic brain injury: A feasibility study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 784-803.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24810148
United States Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (OCR). (2015). Protecting students with disabilities: Frequently asked questions about Section 504 and the education of children with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html
Ungar, M., Liebenberg, L., Dudding, P., Armstrong, M., & van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2013). Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 150-159. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213412002177
Weiner, N.W., Toglia, J., Berg, C. (2012). Weekly Calendar Planning Activity (WCPA): A performance-based assessment of executive function piloted with at-risk adolescents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 699-708. http://ajot.aota.org/article.aspx?articleid=1851629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.