School-based Telerehabilitation In Occupational Therapy: Using Telerehabilitation Technologies to Promote Improvements in Student Performance
This article discusses the use of telerehabilitation technologies in occupational therapy for school-based practice. Telerehabilitation, for the purpose of this program, included the implementation of occupational therapy services via two-way interactive videoconferencing technology. The subjects included in this pilot program were children, ages 6 to 11 years, who attended an online charter school and had difficulties in the areas of fine motor and/or visual motor skills which impacted success with handwriting. Each participant completed a virtual evaluation and six 30-minute intervention sessions. The Print Tool™ Assessment was used to determine progress pre- and post-program. A learning coach/student satisfaction survey was given at the end of the program to determine participant satisfaction. Outcomes revealed improvements in handwriting performance for most students who participated in the program and high satisfaction rates reported by all participants.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ ajot.62.6.625
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2010). Telerehabilitation position paper. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 397-405.
Bayona, C. L., McDougall, J., Tucker, M. A., Nichols, M., & Mandich, A. (2006). School-based occupational therapy for children with fine motor difficulties: Evaluating functional outcomes and fidelity of services. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 26, 89-110.
Casillas, D. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of school- based occupational therapy consultation: Part II. Early Intervention & School Special Interest Section Quarterly,17(2), 1-4.
Cason, J. (2009). A pilot telerehabilitation program: Delivering early intervention services to rural families. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1, 29-37.
Crutchley, S., & Campbell, M. (2010). Telespeech therapy pilot project: Stakeholder satisfaction. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2(1), 23-30.
Dreiling, D. S., & Bundy, A. C. (2003). Brief report—A comparison of consultative model and direct-indirect intervention with preschoolers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 566–569.
Dunn, W. (1990). A comparison of service provision models in school-based occupational therapy services: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research,10, 300-319.
Gallagher, T.E. (2004). Augmentation of special needs services and information to students and teachers “ASSIST”: A telerehabilitation innovation providing school-based medical intervention. Hawaii Medical Journal, 63, 300-309.
Heimerl, S. & Rasch, N. (2009). Delivering developmental occupational therapy consultation services through telerehabilitation. Developmental Disabilities Special Interest Section Quarterly, 32(3), 1-4.
Kairy, D., Lehoux, P., Vincent, C., & Visintin, M. (2009). A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 427-447.
Lai, J. C., Woo, J. Hui, E., & Chan, W. M. (2004). Telerehabilitation – A new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 10, 199-205.
Muller, E. & Ahearn, E. M. (2004). Virtual schools and students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www. projectforum.org/docs/virtual_schools.pdf
Muller, E. (2009). Serving students with disabilities in state-level virtual K-12 public school programs. Retrieved from http://www.projectforum.org/docs/ Ser vingStudentswithDisabilitiesinState-levelVir tualK-12PublicSchoolPrograms.pdf
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2010). Special education and related services teletherapy pilot project [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http: //www.wasa- oly.o rg /Conte nt / Navigation Menu /PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT/ConferenceResources/TeletherapyWASAPresentation08.10.pdf
Olsen, J.Z. & Knapton, E.F. (2008). The Print Tool: The tool to evaluate and remediate. Cabin John, MD: Jan Z. Olsen.
Peterson, C.Q. & Nelson, D.L. (2003). Effect of an occupational intervention on printing in children with economic disadvantages. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 152–160.
Rogante, M., Grigioni, M., Cordella, D., & Giacomozzi, C. (2010). Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. Neurorehabilitation, 27, 287-304.
Russell, T., Buttrum, P., Wootton, R., & Jull, G. (2010). Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 93, 113-120.
Wu, G., & Keyes, L.M. (2006). Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 12, 561-570.
Copyright (c) 2013 Melanie Joy Criss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.