School-based Telerehabilitation In Occupational Therapy: Using Telerehabilitation Technologies to Promote Improvements in Student Performance

Melanie Joy Criss

Abstract


This article discusses the use of telerehabilitation technologies in occupational therapy for school-based practice. Telerehabilitation, for the purpose of this program, included the implementation of occupational therapy services via two-way interactive videoconferencing technology. The subjects included in this pilot program were children, ages 6 to 11 years, who attended an online charter school and had difficulties in the areas of fine motor and/or visual motor skills which impacted success with handwriting. Each participant completed a virtual evaluation and six 30-minute intervention sessions. The Print Tool™ Assessment was used to determine progress pre- and post-program. A learning coach/student satisfaction survey was given at the end of the program to determine participant satisfaction. Outcomes revealed improvements in handwriting performance for most students who participated in the program and high satisfaction rates reported by all participants.


References


American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ ajot.62.6.625

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2010). Telerehabilitation position paper. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 397-405.

Bayona, C. L., McDougall, J., Tucker, M. A., Nichols, M., & Mandich, A. (2006). School-based occupational therapy for children with fine motor difficulties: Evaluating functional outcomes and fidelity of services. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 26, 89-110.

Casillas, D. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of school- based occupational therapy consultation: Part II. Early Intervention & School Special Interest Section Quarterly,17(2), 1-4.

Cason, J. (2009). A pilot telerehabilitation program: Delivering early intervention services to rural families. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1, 29-37.

Crutchley, S., & Campbell, M. (2010). Telespeech therapy pilot project: Stakeholder satisfaction. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2(1), 23-30.

Dreiling, D. S., & Bundy, A. C. (2003). Brief report—A comparison of consultative model and direct-indirect intervention with preschoolers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 566–569.

Dunn, W. (1990). A comparison of service provision models in school-based occupational therapy services: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research,10, 300-319.

Gallagher, T.E. (2004). Augmentation of special needs services and information to students and teachers “ASSIST”: A telerehabilitation innovation providing school-based medical intervention. Hawaii Medical Journal, 63, 300-309.

Heimerl, S. & Rasch, N. (2009). Delivering developmental occupational therapy consultation services through telerehabilitation. Developmental Disabilities Special Interest Section Quarterly, 32(3), 1-4.

Kairy, D., Lehoux, P., Vincent, C., & Visintin, M. (2009). A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 427-447.

Lai, J. C., Woo, J. Hui, E., & Chan, W. M. (2004). Telerehabilitation – A new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 10, 199-205.

Muller, E. & Ahearn, E. M. (2004). Virtual schools and students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www. projectforum.org/docs/virtual_schools.pdf

Muller, E. (2009). Serving students with disabilities in state-level virtual K-12 public school programs. Retrieved from http://www.projectforum.org/docs/ Ser vingStudentswithDisabilitiesinState-levelVir tualK-12PublicSchoolPrograms.pdf

Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2010). Special education and related services teletherapy pilot project [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http: //www.wasa- oly.o rg /Conte nt / Navigation Menu /PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT/ConferenceResources/TeletherapyWASAPresentation08.10.pdf

Olsen, J.Z. & Knapton, E.F. (2008). The Print Tool: The tool to evaluate and remediate. Cabin John, MD: Jan Z. Olsen.

Peterson, C.Q. & Nelson, D.L. (2003). Effect of an occupational intervention on printing in children with economic disadvantages. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 152–160.

Rogante, M., Grigioni, M., Cordella, D., & Giacomozzi, C. (2010). Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. Neurorehabilitation, 27, 287-304.

Russell, T., Buttrum, P., Wootton, R., & Jull, G. (2010). Internet-based outpatient telerehabilitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 93, 113-120.

Wu, G., & Keyes, L.M. (2006). Group tele-exercise for improving balance in elders. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 12, 561-570.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2013.6115

  

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2013 Melanie Joy Criss

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.