Overview of States' Use of Telehealth for the Delivery of Early Intervention (IDEA Part C) Services

Authors

  • Jana Cason Spalding University
  • Diane Behl National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM), Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  • Sharon Ringwalt National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (NECTAC) and Mid-South Regional Resource Center (MSRRC), Chapel Hill, North Carolina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2012.6105

Abstract

Background: Early intervention (EI) services are designed to promote the development of skills and enhance the quality of life of infants and toddlers who have been identified as having a disability or developmental delay, enhance capacity of families to care for their child with special needs, reduce future educational costs, and promote independent living (NECTAC 2011).  EI services are regulated by Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA); however, personnel shortages, particularly in rural areas, limit access for children who qualify.  Telehealth is an emerging delivery model demonstrating potential to deliver EI services effectively and efficiently, thereby improving access and ameliorating the impact of provider shortages in underserved areas. The use of a telehealth delivery model facilitates inter-disciplinary collaboration, coordinated care, and consultation with specialists not available within a local community.  Method:  A survey sent by the National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (NECTAC) to IDEA Part C coordinators assessed their utilization of telehealth within states’ IDEA Part C programs.  Reimbursement for provider type and services and barriers to implement a telehealth service delivery model were identified.  Results:  Representatives from 26 states and one jurisdiction responded to the NECTAC telehealth survey.  Of these, 30% (n=9) indicated that they are either currently using telehealth as an adjunct service delivery model (n=6) or plan to incorporate telehealth within the next 1-2 years (n=3).  Identified telehealth providers included developmental specialists, teachers of the Deaf/Hard of Hearing (DHH), speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, behavior specialists, audiologists, and interpreters.  Reimbursement was variable and included use of IDEA Part C funding, Medicaid, and private insurance.  Expressed barriers and concerns for the implementation of telehealth as a delivery model within Part C programming included security issues (40%; n=11); privacy issues (44%; n=12); concerns about quality of services delivered via telehealth (40%; n=11); and lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of a telehealth service delivery model within IDEA Part C programming (3%; n=1).  Reimbursement policy and billing processes and technology infrastructure were also identified as barriers impacting the implementation of telehealth programming.  Conclusions:  Provider shortages impact the quantity and quality of services available for children with disabilities and developmental delay, particularly in rural areas.  While many states are incorporating telehealth within their Early Intervention (IDEA Part C) services in order to improve access and overcome personnel shortages, barriers persist. Policy development, education of stakeholders, research, utilization of secure and private delivery platforms, and advocacy may facilitate more widespread adoption of telehealth within IDEA Part C programs across the country.

  

Author Biography

Jana Cason, Spalding University

Auerbach School of Occupational Therapy at Spalding University - Louisville, Kentucky

Associate Professor

References

Baharav, E. & Reiser, C. (2010). Using telepractice in parent training in early autism. Telemedicine and e-Health, 16, 727-731.

Behl, D., Houston, K. T, Guthrie, W. S., & Guthrie, N. (2010). Tele-intervention: The wave of the future fits families’ lives today. Exceptional Parent, 40, 23-28.

Boyle, C., Boulet, S., Scheve, L., Cohen, R., Blumber, S., Yeargin-Allsopp, M…Kogan, M. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034-1043. doi: 10:10.1542/peds.2010-2989. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2011/05/19/peds.2010-2989.full.pdf+html

Cason, J. (2009). A pilot telerehabilitation program: Delivering early intervention services to rural families. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1, 29-37.

Cason, J. (2011). Telerehabilitation: An adjunct service delivery model for early intervention services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3(1), 19-30. doi: 10.5195/IJT.2011.6071

Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2011). Cerebral Palsy occurrence in the US. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/features/dscerebralpalsy/index.html

Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2012). Autism Spectrum Disorders: Data and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/autism/data.html

Heimerl, S., & Rasch, N. (2009). Delivering developmental occupational therapy consultation services through telehealth. Developmental Disabilities Special Interest Section Quarterly, 32(3), 1-4.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act [IDEA] of 2004, 20 U.S.C 1400 et seq. (2004).

Kelso, G., Fiechtl, B., Olsen, S., & Rule, S. (2009). The feasibility of virtual home visits to provide early intervention: A pilot study. Infants & Young Children, 22, 332-340.

Liu, C.L., Farrell, J., MacNeil, J.R., Stone, S., & Barfield, W. (2008). Evaluating loss to follow-up in newborn hearing screening in Massachusetts. Pediatrics, 121, e335-e343.

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center [NECTAC]. (2011). The importance of early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. Retrieved from http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/pubs/importanceofearlyintervention.pdf

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center [NECTAC]. (2012a). Early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities (IDEA Part C). Retrieved from http://www.nectac.org/partc/partc.asp

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center [NECTAC]. (2012b). Annual appropriations and number of children served under Part C of IDEA: Federal fiscal years 1987-2012. Retrieved from http://www.nectac.org/partc/partcdata.asp

National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center [NECTAC]. (2012c). Part C SPP/APR indicator analyses: 2012 SPP/APR indicator analyses FFY 2010-2011. Retrieved from http://www.nectac.org/partc/partcapr.asp

National Institute of Health. (2009, December). Cerebral palsy: Hope through research. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. NIH Publication No. 10-159. Retrieved from http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/cerebral_palsy/detail_cerebral_palsy.htm

Rosenberg, S., Zhang, D. & Robinson, C. (2008). Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics, 121, e1503-e1509. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680.

SurveyGizmo [Computer software]. (2012). Boulder, Colorado: SurveyGizmo.

Vohr, B.R., Carty, L.M., Moore, P.E., & Letourneau, K. (1998). The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). Journal of Pediatrics, 133, 353-357.

Downloads

Published

2012-12-14

How to Cite

Cason, J., Behl, D., & Ringwalt, S. (2012). Overview of States’ Use of Telehealth for the Delivery of Early Intervention (IDEA Part C) Services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2012.6105

Issue

Vol. 4, No. 2, Fall 2012

Section

Policy

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>