Making the Case for Uniformity in Professional State Licensure Requirements

Authors

  • Janice A. Brannon American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
  • Ellen R. Cohn University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Jana Cason Spalding University, Auerbach School of Occupational Therapy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2012.6091

Abstract

Telehealth, the use of communication and information technologies to deliver health services, was initially envisioned as a way for persons in rural or remote settings to receive otherwise unavailable healthcare services. Now, in addition to overcoming personnel shortages for underserved populations, telehealth shows promise in meeting the needs of a constantly mobile U.S. society and workforce.  Fortunately, telerehabilitation can meet the needs of a mobile society and workforce by enabling continuity of care for individuals who are out-of-town, on vacation, in temporary residence as a university student, or on business travel. Unfortunately, outdated legislative and regulatory policies and inhospitable infrastructures currently stand in the way of a seamless continuum of care.

In 2010, the American Telemedicine Association’s Telerehabilitation Special Interest Group (TR SIG) convened a License Portability Sub-Committee to explore ways to diminish barriers for state licensure portability with a particular focus on physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and audiology.  In 2011, the Subcommittee published a factsheet that detailed the challenges and potential solutions that surround the difficult issue of licensure portability.  Concurrently, the American Telemedicine Association is advocating for national reform of professional licensure.

At the heart of all licensure requirements is the ability to determine who should be granted the authority to practice in a particular profession.  This is done by focusing on educational, examination and behavioral requirements that are deemed the minimum necessary to protect the public from harm.  States, however, with whom authority for licensure of health professionals rests, have independently determined those minimum requirements.  This approach has led to a myriad of requirements that vary from state to state. 

Licensure portability will best succeed when variability between licensure requirements is minimized and an efficient licensure process exists.    In this paper, these two critical factors for licensure portability are referred to as “licensure requirements” and “the credentialing process.”  Currently the variability between both of these factors is different between professions as well as between jurisdictions.   To find the best solution to licensure portability, it is critical to determine which of these two elements create significant barriers for licensure mobility. This document outlines a method for the professions to begin collecting data to pinpoint the areas where agreement and variations exist in licensure requirements and processes between states.  Such information will inform efforts towards uniformity. 

 

  

Author Biographies

Janice A. Brannon, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Janice A. Brannon is Director, State Special Initiatives, Government Relations & Public Policy. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

Ellen R. Cohn, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Ellen R. Cohn is a co-investigator on the RERC on Telerehabilitation at the University of Pittsburgh, and Associate Dean for Instructional Development, School of Health and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.

Jana Cason, Spalding University, Auerbach School of Occupational Therapy

Jana Cason, DHS, OTR/L, is an Associate Professor in the Auerbach School of Occupational Therapy at Spalding University in Louisville, Kentucky. Dr. Cason is a national and international presenter and author on topics related to telehealth and telerehabilitation. Dr. Cason serves as chair of a Telehealth Ad Hoc Committee with the AOTA, is Vice Chair of the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) Telerehabilitation Special Interest Group (SIG) Executive Committee, and is co-chair of the ATA Telerehabilitation SIG’s Licensure Portability Sub-Committee.    

References

Cohn, E.R., Brannon, J.A., Cason, J. (2011). Resolving barriers to licensure portability for telerehabilitation professionals: American Telemedicine Association’s Telerehabilitation Special Interest Group, Licensure Working Portability Working Group report. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3(2), 31-34. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2011.6078

American Telemedicine Association. (2011). Medical licensure and practice requirements. Retrieved from http://www.americantelemed.org/files/public/policy/ATAPolicy_StateMedicalLicensure.pdf

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. (2010). Health Licensing Board, Report to Congress, Senate Report 111-66. Retrieved from http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/licenserpt10.pdf

Brennan, D., Tindall, L., Theodoros, D., Brown, J., Campbell, M., Christiana, D., Smith, D., Cason, J., & Lee, A. (2010). A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2, 31-34. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2010.6063

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. (2001). 2001 Telemedicine report to Congress. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/telehealth/report2001.pdf

American Telemedicine Association. (2007). Licensure portability position statement and recommendations. Retrieved from http://media.americantelemed.org/news/Whitepapers/Medical%20Licensure%20Portability%20Position.pdf

Downloads

Published

2012-06-06

How to Cite

Brannon, J. A., Cohn, E. R., & Cason, J. (2012). Making the Case for Uniformity in Professional State Licensure Requirements. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2012.6091

Issue

Vol.4, No.1, Spring 2012

Section

Committee Report

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>