Report on the Use of Telehealth in Early Intervention in Colorado: Strengths and Challenges with Telehealth as a Service Delivery Method


  • Beth Cole Colorado Department of Human Services, Office of Early Childhood, Early Intervention Program
  • Katherine Pickard JFK Partners, University of Colorado School of Medicine
  • Arlene Stredler-Brown University of Colorado Boulder



Early Intervention, Part C, Stakeholder Feedback, Telehealth


The use of telehealth as a service delivery method for early intervention (EI) is in its infancy and few studies have examined its use within the context of a statewide program.  The focus of this report was to determine the factors that influence providers’ utilization of telehealth in Colorado’s Part C Early Intervention program (EI Colorado).  This report presents information that was gathered through surveys sent to Part C program administrators, service coordinators, providers, and caregivers. Surveys were used to understand perceptions of telehealth, actual experiences with telehealth, and perceived benefits and challenges using this service delivery method.  Follow-up focus groups were conducted with program administrators and family members to gather more nuanced information. Participants identified several benefits associated with telehealth including its flexibility, access to providers, and more family engagement. The primary barriers included access to high speed internet and the opinion that telehealth was not as effective as in-person treatment. The results in the report served to identify next steps in the implementation of telehealth in Colorado’s Part C EI program.




Adams, R. C., & Tapia, C. (2013). Early intervention, IDEA Part C services, and the medical home: Collaboration for best practice and best outcomes. Pediatrics, 132, 1073-1086. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2305

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Baggett, K. M., Davis, B., Feil, E. G., Sheeber, L. L., Landry, S. H., Carta, J. J., & Leve, C. (2010). Technologies for expanding the reach of evidence-based interventions: Preliminary results for promoting social-emotional development in early childhood. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 226-238. doi: 10.1177/ 0271121409354782

Baharav, E. & Reiser, C. (2010). Using telepractice in parent training in early autism. Telemedicine and e-health. 16, 727-731. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0029

Behl, D., Blaiser, K., Cook, G., Barrett, T., Callow-Heusser, C., Moog Brooks, B., Dawson, P., Quigley, S., & White, K. R. (2017). A multisite study evaluating the benefits of early intervention via telepractice. Infants & Young Children, 30, 147-161. doi:


Blaiser, K. M., Behl, D., Callow-Heusser, C., & White, K. R. (2013). Measuring costs and outcomes of tele-intervention when serving families of children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5, 3-10. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2013.6129

Cason, J. (2011). Telerehabilitation: An adjunct service delivery model for early intervention services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3(1), 19-28. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2011.6071

Dedoose software:

Early Intervention Colorado (2018a). EI data system in Salesforce.

Early Intervention Colorado (2018b). Report to the Joint Budget Committee, November 1, 2018.

Falcone, J., Harris, N., Glick, H., Bell-Souder, D., Stredler-Brown, A., Elder, S., … Sharma. A. (2018, October). Central Auditory Development and Language Outcomes in Children with Hearing Loss Receiving Aural Habilitation: Preliminary Findings. Poster presented at the Colorado Academy of Audiology Conference, Breckenridge, CO.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§1400 et seq.

Ingersoll, B., Straiton, D., Casagrande, K., & Pickard, K. (2018). Community providers’ intentions to use a parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD following training: An application of the theory of planned behavior. BMC Research Notes, 11, 777-783. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3879-3

Ingersoll, B., Wainer, A. L., Berger, N. I., Pickard, K. E., & Bonter, N. (2016). Comparison of a self-directed and therapist-assisted telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD: A pilot RCT. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2275-2284. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2755-z

Little, L. M., Wallisch, A., Pope, E., & Dunn, W. (2018). Acceptability and cost comparison of a telehealth intervention for families of children with autism. Infants & Young Children, 31, 275-286. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000126

McWilliam, R. (2016). Birth to three: Early intervention. In B. Reichow, et al. (Eds.) Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education (pp. 75-84). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Meadan, H., & Daczewitz, M. E. (2015). Internet-based intervention training for parents of young children with disabilities: A promising service-delivery model. Early Child Development and Care, 185, 155-169. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2014.908866

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

OSEP. (2018). Grads 360 report of compliance indicators to the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP).

Pickard, K., Wainer, A., Bailey, K., & Ingersoll, B. (2016). A mixed-method evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth-based parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD. Autism, 20, 845-855. doi: 10.1177/1362361315614496

Rosenberg, S.A., Zhang, F., & Robinson, C.C. (2008). Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics, 121, e1503-1509. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680.

Rush, D. D., & Sheldon, M. L. (2011). The early childhood coaching handbook. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Stredler-Brown, A. (2017). Examination of coaching behaviors used by providers when delivering early intervention via telehealth to families of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Group SIG 9, 2(Part 1), 25-42.

Vismara, L. A., Young, G. S., & Rogers, S. J. (2012). Telehealth for expanding the reach of early autism training to parents. Autism Research and Treatment, 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/121878

Vismara, L. A., McCormick, C., Young, G. S., Nadhan, A., & Monlux, K. (2013). Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 2953-2969. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1841-8

Wainer, A. L., & Ingersoll, B. R. (2015). Increasing access to an ASD imitation intervention via a telehealth parent training program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 3877-3890. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2186-7



How to Cite

Cole, B., Pickard, K., & Stredler-Brown, A. (2019). Report on the Use of Telehealth in Early Intervention in Colorado: Strengths and Challenges with Telehealth as a Service Delivery Method. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 11(1), 33–40.



Early Intervention

Most read articles by the same author(s)