Describing Caregiver and Clinician Experiences with Pediatric Telerehabilitation Across Clinical Disciplines

Authors

  • Meaghan Reitzel School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada AND CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada AND KidsAbility Centre for Child Development, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8509-3207
  • Lori Letts School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-8797
  • Cynthia Lennon KidsAbility Centre for Child Development, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Jennifer Lasenby-Lessard Parent partner and Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • Monika Novak-Pavlic School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada AND CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada AND Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Briano Di Rezze School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada AND CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada
  • Michelle Phoenix School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada AND CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada AND KidsAbility Centre for Child Development, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-3997

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6684

Keywords:

Caregiver experience, Clinician experience, Multidisciplinary, Pediatric telerehabilitation

Abstract

Scope: This study describes the high and low points of caregiver and clinician experiences with pediatric telerehabilitation with consideration for the sustainable adoption of pediatric telerehabilitation beyond the COVID-19 pandemic context.

Methods: As part of a larger study, this project analyzed data from qualitative interviews to describe caregivers’ (n = 27) and clinicians’ (n = 27) experiences with pediatric telerehabilitation.

Findings: Caregiver and clinician experiences with pediatric telerehabilitation are described according to four touchpoints identified: (1) child engagement in telerehabilitation; (2) perceived value of telerehabilitation services and caregiver engagement; (3) preparing the people and environment for telerehabilitation services; (4) fit of using a telerehabilitation model; and (5) providing family with choice.

Discussion: Findings highlight the importance of being informed about the telerehabilitation service model, feeling prepared for telerehabilitation appointments and being responsive to families’ choice. Recommendations to address these areas are discussed.

  

References

Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience- based design. Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.

Camden, C., Pratte, G., Fallon, F., Couture, E., Berbari, J., & Tousignant, M. (2020). Diversity of practices in telerehabilitation for children with disabilities and effective intervention characteristics: Results from a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(24), 3424–3436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1595750

Camden, C., & Silva, M. (2021). Pediatric teleheath: Opportunities created by the COVID-19 and suggestions to sustain its use to support families of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 41(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1825032

Chan, F., Bezyak, J., Romero Ramirez, M., Chiu, C.-Y., Sung, C., & Fujikawa, M. (2010). Concepts, challenges, barriers, and opportunities related to evidence-based practice in rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Education, 24(3 & 4), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1891/088970110805029778

Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2015). Experience based co-design and healthcare improvement: Realizing participatory design in the public sector. Design Journal, 18(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630615X14212498964312

Dostie, R., Gaboury, I., Cinar, E., & Camden, C. (2022). Acceptability of pediatric telerehabilitation interventions provided by physical therapists and occupational therapists-A scoping review. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2064203

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Fairweather, G. C., Lincoln, M., Ramsden, R., & Bulkeley, K. (2021). Parent engagement and therapeutic alliance in allied health teletherapy programs. Health & Social Care in the Community, 00, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13235

Google. (n.d.). Google Jamboard. jamboard.google.com

Goorts, K., Dizon, J., & Milanese, S. (2021). The effectiveness of implementation strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(241), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06190-0

Graham, F., Williman, J., Sutherland, L., & Wijninckx, M. (2023). Telehealth delivery of paediatric rehabilitation for children with neurodisability: A mixed methods realist evaluation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 49(1), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13028

Grant, C., Jones, A., & Land, H. (2022). What are the perspectives of speech pathologists, occupational therapists and physiotherapists on using telehealth videoconferencing for service delivery to children with developmental delays? A systematic review of the literature. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 30(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12843

Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O’Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., & Duda, S. N. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95(May), 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

King, G., Chiarello, L. A., Ideishi, R., Ziviani, J., Phoenix, M., McLarnon, M. J. W., Pinto, M., Thompson, L., & Smart, E. (2019). The complexities and synergies of engagement: An ethnographic study of engagement in outpatient pediatric rehabilitation sessions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(16), 2353–2365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1700562

Kuzel, A. j. (1999). Sampling in Qualitative Inquiry. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 33–45). SAGE Publications.

Kwok, E., Cunningham, B., Pozniak, K., Chiu, J., & Rosenbaum, P. (2022b, August 10). CanChild Telepractice Resources. Telepractice resources for pediatric communication professionals. https://www.canchild.ca/en/resources/356-telepractice-resources

Kwok, E. Y. L., Pozniak, K., Cunningham, B. J., & Rosenbaum, P. (2022a). Factors influencing the success of telepractice during the COVID-19 pandemic and preferences for post-pandemic services: An interview study with clinicians and parents. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 57(6), 1354–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12760

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427

Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632

Lindsay, S., Ragunathan, S., Kingsnorth, S., Zhou, C., Kakonge, L., Cermak, C., Hickling, A., & Wright, F. V. (2023). Understanding the benefits and challenges of outpatient virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Canadian pediatric rehabilitation hospital. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2221902

McCarthy, E., & Guerin, S. (2022). Family-centred care in early intervention: A systematic review of the processes and outcomes of family-centered care and impacting factors. Child: Care, Health and Development, 48(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12901

Microsoft Corporation. (2016). Microsoft Word. https://office.microsoft.com/word

Moll, S., Wyndham-West, M., Mulvale, G., Park, S., Buettgen, A., Phoenix, M., Fleisig, R., & Bruce, E. (2020). Are you really doing a “codesign”? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations. BMJ Open, 10(11), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339

Mulvale, G., Moll, S., Miatello, A., Murray-Leung, L., Rogerson, K., & Sassi, R. B. (2019). Co-designing services for youth with mental health issues: Novel elicitation approaches. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918816244

Ogourtsova, T. (2023). TelereHUB-CHILD: An online integrated knowledge translation tool to optimize telerehabilitation evidence-based practices for children with disabilities and their families. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1139432

Ogourtsova, T., Boychuck, Z., O’Donnell, M., Ahmed, S., Osman, G., & Majnemer, A. (2023). Telerehabilitation for children and youth with developmental disabilities and their families: A systematic review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 43(2), 129–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2106468

Parmanto, B., & Saptono, A. (2009). Telerehabilitation: State-of-the-art from an informatics perspective. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2009.6015

Phoenix, M., Smart, E., & King, G. (2020). “I Didn’t Know What to Expect”: Describing parents’ expectations in children’s rehabilitation services. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 40(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2019.1665155

Reitzel, M., Letts, L., Lennon, C., Lasenby-Lessard, J., Novak-Pavlic, M., Di Rezze, B., & Phoenix, M. (2023). Co-designing solutions to enhance access and engagement in pediatric telerehabilitation. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1293833

Retamal-Walter, F., Waite, M., & Scarinci, N. (2022). Exploring engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with developmental disability and their families: A qualitative systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2048098

Retamal-Walter, F., Waite, M., & Scarinci, N. (2023). Families’ and professionals’ perspectives of building and maintaining engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with communication disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 45(7), 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2055161

Rosenbaum, P., King, S., Law, M., King, G., & Evans, J. (1998). Family-centered service A conceptual framework and research review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v18n01_01

Rosenbaum, P., Silva, M., & Camden, C. (2021). Let’s not go back to ‘normal’! Lessons from COVID-19 for professionals working in childhood disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(7), 1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1862925

Tanner, K., Bican, R., & Boster, J. (2020). Feasibility and acceptability of clinical pediatric telerehabilitation services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6336

Wittmeier, K. D. M., Hammond, E., Tymko, K., Burnham, K., Janssen, T., Pablo, A. J., Russell, K., Pierce, S., Costello, C., & Protudjer, J. L. P. (2022). “Another Tool in Your Toolkit”: Pediatric occupational and physical therapists’ perspectives of initiating telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 42(5), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2065898

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (2023). Zoom.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Reitzel, M., Letts, L., Lennon, C., Lasenby-Lessard, J., Novak-Pavlic, M., Di Rezze, B., & Phoenix, M. (2025). Describing Caregiver and Clinician Experiences with Pediatric Telerehabilitation Across Clinical Disciplines . International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6684

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Clinical Research

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Meaghan Reitzel, Lori Letts, Cynthia Lennon, Jennifer Lasenby-Lessard, Monika Novak-Pavlic, Briano Di Rezze, Michelle Phoenix

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link. 

Funding data

Most read articles by the same author(s)