Identifying the Added Value and Requirements of Telerehabilitation in Home-based Geriatric Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Authors

  • Chris J. Gamble Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Stichting Valkenhof, Valkenswaard, the Netherlands
  • Eleonore van Dam van Isselt Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Noah Adams Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Dennis P.H.G. Roekx Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  • Jolanda C.M. van Haastregt Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6681

Keywords:

Home-Based, Geriatric Rehabilitation, Telerehabilitation

Abstract

Geriatric rehabilitation (GR) facilities are turning to innovative tools such as telerehabilitation to support home-based treatment due to challenges with population ageing, staff shortages, and mounting budgetary pressures. This study identified the potential added value as well as the requirements of using telerehabilitation in home-based GR, according to stakeholders and potential end-users. This exploratory qualitative study design conducted semi-structured interviews among nineteen care professionals, three patients and one informal caregiver. The qualitative data from these interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed with inductive content analysis. Interviewees indicated multiple added values and requirements for telerehabilitation in home-based GR. Overall, there was great emphasis on blended care implementation,
in which telerehabilitation is used in conjunction with in-person care. It is recommended to use the present findings towards developing and implementing a telerehabilitation intervention in home-based GR and assess its feasibility and usability.

  

References

Achterberg, W. P., Cameron, I. D., Bauer, J. M., & Schols, J. M. (2019). Geriatric Rehabilitation-state of the art and future priorities. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20(4), 396-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.02.014

Ashe, M., Ekegren, C., Chudyk, A., Fleig, L., Gill, T., Langford, D., Martín-Martín, L., & Ariza-Vega, P. (2018). Telerehabilitation for community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults after musculoskeletal trauma: A systematic review. AIMS Medical Science, 5, 316-336. https://doi.org/10.3934/medsci.2018.4.316

Bachmann, S., Finger, C., Huss, A., Egger, M., Stuck, A. E., & Clough-Gorr, K. M. (2010). Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 340, c1718. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1718

Batsis, J. A., DiMilia, P. R., Seo, L. M., Fortuna, K. L., Kennedy, M. A., Blunt, H. B., Bagley, P. J., Brooks, J., Brooks, E., Kim, S. Y., Masutani, R. K., Bruce, M. L., & Bartels, S. J. (2019). Effectiveness of Ambulatory telemedicine care in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(8), 1737-1749. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15959

Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008). Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 371(9614), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60342-6

Crotty, M., Killington, M., van den Berg, M., Morris, C., Taylor, A., & Carati, C. (2014). Telerehabilitation for older people using off-the-shelf applications: Acceptability and feasibility. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20(7), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x14552382

Crotty, M., Whitehead, C. H., Gray, S., & Finucane, P. M. (2002). Early discharge and home rehabilitation after hip fracture achieves functional improvements: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(4), 406-413. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr518oa

Foster, M. V., & Sethares, K. A. (2014). Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of telehealth in older adults: An integrative review. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 32(11), 523-533; quiz 534-525. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000105

Fox, M. T., Persaud, M., Maimets, I., Brooks, D., O'Brien, K., & Tregunno, D. (2013). Effectiveness of early discharge planning in acutely ill or injured hospitalized older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 13, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-70

Gamble, C. J., van Haastregt, J., van Dam van Isselt, E. F., Zwakhalen, S., & Schols, J. (2024). Effectiveness of guided telerehabilitation on functional performance in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 38(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155231217411

Grund, S., Gordon, A. L., van Balen, R., Bachmann, S., Cherubini, A., Landi, F., Stuck, A. E., Becker, C., Achterberg, W. P., Bauer, J. M., & Schols, J. (2020). European consensus on core principles and future priorities for geriatric rehabilitation: Consensus statement. European Geriatric Medicine, 11(2), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00274-1

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117

Holstege, M. S., Caljouw, M. A. A., Zekveld, I. G., van Balen, R., de Groot, A. J., van Haastregt, J. C. M., Schols, J., Hertogh, C., Gussekloo, J., & Achterberg, W. P. (2017). Successful geriatric rehabilitation: Effects on patients' outcome of a national program to improve quality of care, the SINGER Study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(5), 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.10.011

Jon Kaplan, A. B., Sarah Thom, and Julia Baker. (2022). An aging-in-place strategy for the next generation. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/aging-in-place-plan-for-next-generation

Jørgensen, B. B., Gregersen, M., Pallesen, S. H., & Damsgaard, E. M. (2021). A group-based real-time videoconferencing telerehabilitation programme in recently discharged geriatric patients: A feasibility study. European Geriatric Medicine, 12(4), 801-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00444-6

Kiel, S., Gerhardt, S., Meinhold, S., Meinhold, A., Schmidt, C. O., & Chenot, J. F. (2019). [Course of Treatment and sustainability of ambulatory geriatric rehabilitation - an analysis of 128 geriatric patients]. Rehabilitation (Stuttgart), 58(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0604-4068 (Behandlungsverläufe und Nachhaltigkeit der Ambulanten Geriatrischen Komplexbehandlung – eine Analyse von 128 geriatrischen Patienten.)

Kip, H., Kelders, S. M., & Gemert-Pijnen, L. J. E. W. C. V. (2019a). Putting the Value in VR: How to Systematically and Iteratively Develop a Value-Based VR Application with a Complex Target Group Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland Uk. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300365

Kip, H., Kelders, S. M., Weerink, K., Kuiper, A., Brüninghoff, I., Bouman, Y. H. A., Dijkslag, D., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (2019b). Identifying the added value of virtual reality for treatment in forensic mental health: A scenario-based, qualitative approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 406. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00406

Koelsch, L. E. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Member Check Interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200105

Kraaijkamp, J. J. M., van Dam van Isselt, E. F., Persoon, A., Versluis, A., Chavannes, N. H., & Achterberg, W. P. (2021). eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: Systematic review of effectiveness, feasibility, and usability. Journal of Medical Internet Ressearch, 23(8), e24015. https://doi.org/10.2196/24015

Krabbe-Alkemade, Y., Makai, P., Shestalova, V., & Voesenek, T. (2020). Containing or shifting? Health expenditure decomposition for the aging Dutch population after a major reform. Health Policy, 124(3), 268-274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.016

Kukafka, R., Johnson, S. B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003). Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(3), 218-227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.002

Langhorne, P., Taylor, G., Murray, G., Dennis, M., Anderson, C., Bautz-Holter, E., Dey, P., Indredavik, B., Mayo, N., Power, M., Rodgers, H., Ronning, O. M., Rudd, A., Suwanwela, N., Widen-Holmqvist, L., & Wolfe, C. (2005). Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: A meta-analysis of individual patients' data. Lancet, 365(9458), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17868-4

Laver, K. E., Adey-Wakeling, Z., Crotty, M., Lannin, N. A., George, S., & Sherrington, C. (2020). Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD010255. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3

Marzuca-Nassr, G. N., Seron, P., Román, C., Gálvez, M., Navarro, R., Latin, G., Marileo, T., Molina, J. P., Sepúlveda, P., & Oliveros, M. J. (2022). A hybrid exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program is an effective strategy to improve muscle strength and functional exercise capacity in adults and older people with coronary artery disease. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, 948273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.948273

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practise, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

Oh-Park, M., Lew, H. L., & Raghavan, P. (2021). Telerehabilitation for geriatrics. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 32(2), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2021.01.003

Ossebaard, H. C., Bruijn, A. d., Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C. v., & Geertsma, R. E. (2013). Risks related to the use of eHealth technologies : An exploratory study. RIVM Report, 360127001/2013.

Pieterse, M., Kip, H., & Cruz-Martínez, R. (2018). The complexity of eHealth Implementation: A theoretical and practical perspective. In (pp. 247-270). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315385907-12

Polit, D. B., C. (2019). Sampling in Qualitative Research; Nursing Research. Wolters Kluwer Health.

Preitschopf, A., Holstege, M., Ligthart, A., Groen, W., Burchell, G., Pol, M., & Buurman, B. (2023). Effectiveness of outpatient geriatric rehabilitation after inpatient geriatric rehabilitation or hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac300

Prins, L. A. P., Gamble, C. J., van Dam van Isselt, E. F., Stammen, R. A. I., Ettaibi, A., Creemers, I. A. M., & van Haastregt, J. C. M. (2023). An exploratory study investigating factors influencing the outpatient delivery of geriatric rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155045

Reeder, B., Chung, J., & Stevens-Lapsley, J. (2016). Current telerehabilitation research with older adults at home: An integrative review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 42(10), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20160201-02

Saito, T., & Izawa, K. P. (2021). Effectiveness and feasibility of home-based telerehabilitation for community-dwelling elderly people in Southeast Asian countries and regions: A systematic review. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01820-3

Snoswell, C. L., Taylor, M. L., Comans, T. A., Smith, A. C., Gray, L. C., & Caffery, L. J. (2020). Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e17298. https://doi.org/10.2196/17298

Tenforde, A. S., Hefner, J. E., Kodish-Wachs, J. E., Iaccarino, M. A., & Paganoni, S. (2017). Telehealth in physical medicine and rehabilitation: A narrative review. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 9(5s), S51-s58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.013

van Balen, R., Gordon, A. L., Schols, J. M. G. A., Drewes, Y. M., & Achterberg, W. P. (2019). What is geriatric rehabilitation and how should it be organized? A Delphi study aimed at reaching European consensus. European Geriatric Medicine, 10(6), 977-987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-019-00244-7

van den Besselaar, J. B., B.; Hartel, L.; Jongenburger, A.; van Peppen, R.; Stornebrink, E.; Wan, J. (2021). Varen op ervaringen | Studio GRZ.

van Egmond, M. A., van der Schaaf, M., Vredeveld, T., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Klinkenbijl, J. H. G., & Engelbert, R. H. H. (2018). Effectiveness of physiotherapy with telerehabilitation in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 104(3), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.04.004

van Oostrom, S. H., Picavet, H. S., de Bruin, S. R., Stirbu, I., Korevaar, J. C., Schellevis, F. G., & Baan, C. A. (2014). Multimorbidity of chronic diseases and health care utilization in general practice. BMC Family Practise, 15, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-61

Velayati, F., Ayatollahi, H., & Hemmat, M. (2020). A systematic review of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions for therapeutic purposes in the elderly. Methods of Information in Medicine, 59(2-03), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713398

Wicks, M., Dennett, A. M., & Peiris, C. L. (2023). Physiotherapist-led, exercise-based telerehabilitation for older adults improves patient and health service outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 52(11). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad207

Wildenbos, G. A., Peute, L., & Jaspers, M. (2018). Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 114, 66-75.

World Health Organization. (2018). Aging and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health#:~:text=By%202050%2C%20the%20world's%20population,in%20this%20age%20group%20worldwide.

Yarnall, A. J., Sayer, A. A., Clegg, A., Rockwood, K., Parker, S., & Hindle, J. V. (2017). New horizons in multimorbidity in older adults. Age Ageing, 46(6), 882-888. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx150

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Gamble, C. J., van Dam van Isselt, E., Zwakhalen, S. M., Adams, N., Roekx, D. P., & van Haastregt, J. C. (2025). Identifying the Added Value and Requirements of Telerehabilitation in Home-based Geriatric Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6681

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Physical Therapy Telehealth

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Chris Gamble, Leonoor van Dam - van Isselt, Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen, Noah Adams, Dennis P.H.G. Roekx, Jolanda C.M. van Haastregt

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.