The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A Feasible Multidisciplinary Outcome Measure for Pediatric Telerehabilitation

Authors

  • Lynn R Tanner Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-6326
  • Kathy Grinde Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Cristin McCormick Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2021.6372

Keywords:

Child, Occupational therapy, Physical therapy, Speech-language Pathology, Telerehabilitation

Abstract

This study describes the feasibility of using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) as a multidisciplinaryoutcome measure for pediatric telerehabilitation (TR). The COPM was administered at monthly time points over four months. A follow-up survey was conducted with the therapists to assess clinical utility of the COPM. Seventy-three percent of the children seen in TR > one month had at least two administrations of the COPM. Eighty percent of therapists agreed or strongly agreed that the COPM was easy to use in a reasonable amount of time, helped identify functional goals, could be used with various children with varied diagnoses, and measured functional change. In 37 children, the median clinical change in performance and satisfaction was two points or greater on the COPM over the episode of TR. The COPM is a feasible measure perceived positively by pediatric therapists for TR use.

  

Author Biography

Lynn R Tanner, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Children’s Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Lynn Tanner, PT is a physical therapist and rehabilitation clinical specialist in oncology at Children’s Minnesota. She received her BA in Child Psychology from the University of Minnesota in 1999, her Master’s in Physical Therapy from the Mayo School of Health Related Sciences in 2001, and is pursuing her PhD at the University of Minnesota.  In her current role as a rehabilitation clinical specialist, she provides PT services to the oncology population in the Cancer and Blood Disorders clinic, conducts research investigating peripheral neuropathy and the impact of PT in pediatric oncology, and leads cancer rehabilitation and telerehabilitation program development.  She has published multiple research manuscripts in collaboration with other experts in the field and leads a cancer rehabilitation program development training for other hospitals interested in evidence-based care. She has presented around the country at the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Combined Section Meetings, American Pediatric Hematology Oncology Nursing Association Conferences, Children’s Hospitals Association Leadership Meeting, Children’s Oncology Group meetings, and at local Universities. Honors include the APTA Oncology Jeri F. Walton Award for Service, APTA Emerging Leader Award, Oncology Section Stephen Gudas Award for Outstanding Publication in Rehabilitation Oncology with Dr. Laura Gilchrist, and the Children’s Minnesota Board Quality award.  She was co-creator and chair of the Pediatric Oncology Special Interest Group of the APTA from 2010 to 2014. Currently she serves as the Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy Balance and Falls Special Interest Group Chair, and is the co-creator and co-chair of the Cancer Rehabilitation Networking Group Pediatric Task Force of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

References

Calder, S., Ward, R., Jones, M., Johnston, J., & Claessen, M. (2018, October 23). The uses of outcome measures within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1353144

Camden, C., Pratte, G., Fallon, F., Couture, M., Berbari, J., & Tousignant, M. (2020, November 19). Diversity of practices in telerehabilitation for children with disabilities and effective intervention characteristics: Results from a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1595750

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. (n.d.). Using the COPM in multidisciplinary teams. https://www.thecopm.ca/casestudy/the-copm-in-multidisciplinary-teams/

Carswell, A., Mary, Mccoll, A., Baptiste, S., Law, M., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (2004). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 210-222.

Coyne, I., Holmström, I., & Söderbäck, M. (2018). Centeredness in healthcare: A concept synthesis of family-centered care, person-centered care and child-centered care. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 42, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.07.001

Cusick, A., Lannin, N. A, & Lowe, K. (2007). Adapting the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for use in a paediatric clinical trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(10), 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600929201

Dreyer, N. C., Dreyer, K. A., Shaw, D. K., & Wittman, P. P. (2001) Efficacy of telemedicine in occupational therapy: A pilot study. Journal of Allied Health, 30, 39-42.

Eyssen, I. C. J. M., Steultjens, M. P. M., Oud, T. a M., Bolt, E. M., Maasdam, A., & Dekker, J. (2011). Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0110

Ferre, C. L., Brandão, M., Surana, B., Dew, A. P., Moreau, N. G., & Gordon, A. M. (2017). Caregiver-directed home-based intensive bimanual training in young children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: A randomized trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 59(5), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13330

Heus, I., Weezenberg, D., Severijnen, S., Vliet Vlieland, T., & van der Holst, M. (2020). Measuring treatment outcome in children with developmental coordination disorder; responsiveness of six outcome measures. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1785022

Hung, G. K. N., Fong, K. N. K. (2019). Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 32(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1569186119849119

Kairy, D., Lehoux, P., Vincent, C., & Visintin, M. (2009). A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(6), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802062553

Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., Mccoll, M. A., Polatajko, H., Pollock. (2005). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Assessment (Vol. Fourth). Toronto (Canada): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.

Mani, S., Sharma, S., Omar, B., Paungmali, A., & Joseph, L. (2017). Validity and reliability of internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16642369

Mirek, E., Logan, D., Boullard, K., Hall, A. M., Staffa, S. J., & Sethna, N. (2019). Physical therapy outcome measures for assessment of lower extremity chronic pain-related function in pediatrics. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 31(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000587

Nicola, K., Waugh, J., Charles, E., & Russell, T. (2018). The feasibility and concurrent validity of performing the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd Edition via telerehabilitation technology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 77, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.001

Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. British Medical Journal Quality and Safety, 25(12), 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411

Øien, I., Fallang, B., & Østensjø, S. (2010). Goal-setting in paediatric rehabilitation: Perceptions of parents and professional. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(4), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01038.x

Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Grace, E., & Wood, D. (2015). Enhancing social participation in young people with communication disabilities living in rural Australia: Outcomes of a home-based intervention for using social media. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(17), 1576–1590. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1052578

Richmond, T., Peterson, C., Cason, J., Billings, M., Terrell, E. A., Lee, A. W., C, Towey, M., Parmanto, B., Saptono, A., Cohn, E. R., & Brennan, D. (2017). American Telemedicine Association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(2), 63–68.

Sakzewski, L., Boyd, R. & Ziviani, J. (2007). Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(3), 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00232.x.

Steinhart, S., Raz-Silbiger, S., Beeri, M., & Gilboa, Y. (2020). Occupation based telerehabilitation intervention for adolescents with myelomeningocele: A pilot study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 41(2), 176-191https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2020.1807448

Taylor, O. D., Armfield, N. R., Dodrill, P., & Smith, A. C. (2014). A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of using telehealth for paediatric speech and language assessment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X14552388

Tenforde, A. S., Borgstrom, H., Polich, G., Steere, H., Davis, I. S., Cotton, K., … Silver, J. K. (2020). Outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapy synchronous telemedicine: A survey study of patient satisfaction with virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(11), 977–981. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001571

Verkerk, G. J. Q., van der Molen-Meulmeester, L., & Alsem, M. W. (2020). How children and their parents value using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) with children themselves. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 1, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3233/prm-190604

Verkerk, G. J. Q., Wolf, M. J. M. A. G., Louwers, A. M., Meester-Delver, A., & Nollet, F. (2006). The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(11), 980–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070703

Wong, B. M., & Sullivan, G. M. (2016, May 1). How to write up your quality improvement initiatives for publication. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00086.1

Downloads

Published

2021-06-21

How to Cite

Tanner, L. R., Grinde, K., & McCormick, C. (2021). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A Feasible Multidisciplinary Outcome Measure for Pediatric Telerehabilitation. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2021.6372

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Clinical Reports

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.