A Survey of Telepractice in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology in India

Haritha S. Mohan, Ayesha Anjum, Prema K.S. Rao


Telepractice has emerged as a form of service delivery to assess and treat individuals with communication disorders. The present study surveyed speech-language pathologists and audiologists in India about the use of telepractice. Two hundred and five (N=205) speech-language pathologists and audiologists responded to a questionnaire, with 12.19% reporting their use of telepractice to deliver clinical services. Respondents also indicated an urgent shortage of professionals in India to deliver clinical services in speech-language pathology and audiology, and opined that these needs can be met via the use of telepractice. India is well known throughout the world for the advanced application of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), with 931.95 million telephone subscribers, over 900 million mobile phone users, and the second-largest mobile phone usage in the world.  India has also experienced a tremendous rise in the number of internet users. Therefore, India is well poised to fully develop telepractice to overcome the barriers of distance and amplify the availability of speech-language pathology, audiology and other healthcare services. But first, the widespread use of telepractice throughout the nation will require an improved infrastructure (e.g., to uphold privacy and security); training for professionals; and telepractice policies. While very promising, the deployment of telepractice throughout India will require the attention of policy makers and government organizations. 

Keywords: Audiology, India, Speech Language Pathology, Telehealth, Telepractice


th Annual report 2015-16 of the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Rehabilitation Council of India, 2016 Retrieved from http://www.rehabcouncil.nic.in/ writereaddata/29thEnglishAR.pdf

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2005a). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice [Knowledge and Skills]. Retrieved from https://doi: 10.1044/policy.KS2005-00077

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2011). Survey of telepractice use among audiologists and speech-language pathologists, 2002.

Basavaraj, V. (2009). Ethical guidelines for bio-behavioural research. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.

Fong, B., Fong, A. C. M., & Li, C. K. (2011). Telemedicine technologies: Information technologies in medicine and telehealth. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.

Indian Speech and Hearing Association (2015). Retrieved on August 15, 2017, from http://www.ishaindia.org.in/

Indian Speech and Hearing Association. Members on roll as of 12 May, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.ishaindia.org.in/

McCue, M., Fairman, A., & Pramuka M. (2010). Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 195-205. https://doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.005

NSSO (2002) GOI. Ministry of statistics and programme implementation, National Sample Survey Office. (2002) Retrieved from http://www.mospi.gov.in

Rao, K.S., & Yashaswini, R. (2017). Tele service in speech-language pathology and audiology prospects and challenges. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Theodoros, D. (2011). Telepractice in speech-language pathology: The evidence, the challenges, and the future. Perspectives on Telepractice, 1(1), 10-21. https:// doi:10.1044/tele1.1.10

Winters, J. M., & Winters, J. M. (2004). A telehomecare model for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health, 10, 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2004.10.200

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6233



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.