Results of a Survey Offering Clinical Insights into Speech-Language Pathology Telepractice Methods

Elizabeth U. Grillo

Abstract


A telepractice survey was administered to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Special Interest Group 18 Telepractice affiliates and attendees of the Waldo County General Hospital Speech-Language Pathology Telepractice Training program in Maine, USA over the summer of 2016.   Sixty-seven respondents completed the survey.  The survey explored demographics of clients and clinicians, costs and equipment, learning opportunities, use of the client’s environment and caregivers/e-helpers, and method adaptations in telepractice.  The results of the survey provide information on the current state of telepractice methods in speech-language pathology from experienced practitioners.  This information may be used to develop telepractice models and to prepare speech-language pathology graduate students in the delivery of telepractice methods.

 Keywords: eHealth, Telehealth, Telemedicine, Telepractice


References


Administration on Aging (2014). Aging statistics. Retrieved from http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Survey report on telepractice use among audiologists and speech-language pathologists. Available at www.asha.org

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). 2016 SIG 18 telepractice services survey results. Available from www.asha.org.

Carlin, C. H. (2012). The use of e-supervision for graduate students who are enrolled in student teaching practicum. Unpublished manuscript.

Cason J. & Cohn, E.R. (2014). Telepractice: An overview and best practices. SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 4-17. https://doi:10.1044/aac23.1.4

Dudding, C. C. (2006). Distance supervision: An update. Perspectives on Administration and Supervision, 16(1), 16–18.

Dudding, C. C. (2004). Perceptions of the use of videoconferencing for supervision: Differences among graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia).

Dudding, C. C., & Justice, L. (2004). A model for e-supervision: Videoconferencing as a clinical training tool. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401040250030501

Grogan-Johnson, S., Meehan, R., McCormick, K., & Miller, N. (2015). Results of a national survey of preservice telepractice training in graduate speech-language pathology and audiology programs. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 42, 122-137.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (1996). Public Law 104-191, 104th United States Congress, August 21, 1996.

McCue, M., Fairman, A., & Pramuka, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.005

Pickering, M., McAllister, L., Hagler, P., Whitehill, T.L., Penn, C., Robertson, S.J., & McCready, V. (1998). External factors influencing the profession in six societies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 5-17. https://doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0704.05

World Health Organization (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6230

  

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.