The Efficacy of Telehealth-Delivered Speech and Language Intervention for Primary School-Age Children: A Systematic Review.

Danielle Wales, Leisa Skinner, Melanie Hayman

Abstract


The purpose of this article is to determine if telehealth-delivered speech-language pathology interventions are as effective as traditional in-person delivery for primary school-age children with speech and/or language difficulties. A systematic review was conducted (in accordance with PRISMA guidelines) using five databases, two journals and reference lists. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion, with relevant studies reviewed in full-text. Initial searches identified 132 articles. Following exclusion of non-relevant studies, seven articles remained for inclusion. Results revealed both telehealth and in-person participants made significant and similar improvements when treatment effects were measured through five of the six outcome measures. Findings showed there is limited but promising evidence to support telehealth for delivering speech-language pathology intervention services to school-age children. Whilst this is encouraging, particularly for rural children where in-person services are limited, more rigorous study designs are required to support the efficacy of telehealth for this population.


References


American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2003). National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS): K-12 Speech-language pathology user's guide. Maryland: American Speech Language Hearing Association.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2014-15. (Cat. No. 8146.0). Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/8146.0

Australian Government: National Health and Medical Research Council. (2009). NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf

Beitchman, J. H., Wilson, B., Johnson, C. J., Atkinson, L., Young, A., Adlaf, E., . . . Douglas, L. (2001). Fourteen-year follow-up of speech/language-impaired and control children: Psychiatric outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(1), 75-82. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200101000-00019

Clegg, J., Hollis, C., Mawhood, L., & Rutter, M. (2005). Developmental language disorders – a follow-up in later adult life. Cognitive, language and psychosocial outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 128-149. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00342.x

Constantinescu, G., Waite, M., Dornan, D., Rushbrooke, E., Brown, J., McGovern, J., . . . Hill, A. (2014). A pilot study of telepractice delivery for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20, 135-140. doi:10.1177/1357633X14528443

Crutchley, S., & Campbell, M. (2010). TeleSpeech therapy pilot project: Stakeholder satisfaction. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2(2), 23-30. doi:10.5195/ijt.2010.6049

Edwards, M., Stredler-Brown, A., & Houston, K. T. (2012). Expanding use of telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology. Volta Review, 112, 227-242.

Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., & Alam, K. (2016). Towards understanding digital divide in rural partnerships and development: A framework and evidence from rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 214-224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.002

Fairweather, G. C., Lincoln, M. A., & Ramsden, R. (2016). Speech-language pathology teletherapy in rural and remote educational settings: Decreasing service inequities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 592-602. doi:10.3109/17549507.2016.1143973

Gabel, R., Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R., Bechstein, L., & Taylor, J. (2013). A field study of telepractice for school intervention using the ASHA NOMS K-12 database. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 44-53. doi:10.1177/1525740113503035

Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2002). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2. Minnesota: American Guidance Service Inc.

Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Creaghead, N. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16, 134-139. doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.090608

Grogan-Johnson, S., Gabel, R. M., Taylor, J., Rowan, L. E., Alvares, R., & Schenker, J. (2011). A pilot investigation of speech sound disorder intervention delivered by telehealth to school-age children. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 3(1), 31-41. doi:10.5195/ijt.2011.6064

Grogan-Johnson, S., Schmidt, A. M., Schenker, J., Alvares, R., Rowan, L. E., & Taylor, J. (2013). A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 210-220. doi:10.1177/1525740113484965

Health Workforce Australia [HWA]. (2014). Australia’s Health Workforce series - Speech pathologists in focus. Retrieved from http://industry.gov.au/

Isaki, E., & Farrell, C. F. (2015). Provision of speech-language pathology telepractice services using apple iPads. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21, 538-549. doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0153

Jessiman, S. M. (2003). Speech and languages services using telehealth technology in remote and underserviced areas. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 27(1), 45-51.

Johnson, C. J., Beitchman, J. H., & Brownlie, E. B. (2010). Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: Family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(1), 51-65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0083)

Law, J., Boyle, J., Harris, F., Harkness, A., & Nye, C. (1998). Screening for primary speech and language delay: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33(Suppl), 21-23. doi:10.3109/13682829809179388

Law, J., Garrett, Z., & Nye, C. (2003). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(3). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004110

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

Lincoln, M., Hines, M., Fairweather, C., Ramsden, R., & Martinovich, J. (2015). Multiple stakeholder perspectives on teletherapy delivery of speech pathology services in rural schools: A preliminary, qualitative investigation. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 6(6), 64-74. doi:10.5195/ijt.2014.6155

Mashima, P. A., & Doarn, C. R. (2008). Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 1101-1117.

McCormack, J., Harrison, L. J., McLeod, S., & McAllister, L. (2011). A nationally representative study of the association between communication impairment at 4-5 years and children's life activities at 7-9 years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1328-1348. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0155)

McCormack, J., & Verdon, S. E. (2015). Mapping speech pathology services to developmentally vulnerable and at-risk communities using the Australian Early Development Census. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 273-286. doi:10.3109/17549507.2015.1034175

Owens, R. E. (2012). Language development: An introduction (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

Park, S., Freeman, J., Middleton, C., Allen, M., Eckermann, R., & Everson, R. (2015, 5-8 Jan. 2015). The Multi-layers of digital exclusion in rural Australia. Paper presented at the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Reynolds, A. L., Vick, J. L., & Haak, N. J. (2009). Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: A modified narrative review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15, 310-316. doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.081215

Ruben, R. J. (2000). Redefining the survival of the fittest: Communication disorders in the 21st century. Laryngoscope, 110, 241-241. doi:10.1097/00005537-200002010-00010

Schoon, I., Parsons, S., Rush, R., & Law, J. (2010). Children's language ability and psychosocial development: A 29-year follow-up study. Pediatrics, 126(1), e73-80. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3282

Sicotte, C., Lehoux, P., Fortier-Blanc, J., & Leblanc, Y. (2003). Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 253-258. doi:10.1258/135763303769211256

Speech Pathology Australia [SPA]. (2014). Telepractice in Speech Pathology [Position Statement]. Retrieved from http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/

Taylor, O. D., Armfield, N. R., Dodrill, P., & Smith, A. C. (2014). A review of the efficacy and effectiveness of using telehealth for paediatric speech and language assessment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 20, 405-412. doi:10.1177/1357633X14552388

Theodoros, D. (2012). A new era in speech-language pathology practice: Innovation and diversification. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 189-199. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.639390

Whitehouse, A. J., Watt, H. J., Line, E. A., & Bishop, D. V. (2009). Adult psychosocial outcomes of children with specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 511-528. doi:10.1080/13682820802708098




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6219

  

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.