Measuring Costs and Outcomes of Tele-Intervention When Serving Families of Children who are Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing
Background: Optimal outcomes for children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing (DHH) depend on access to high quality, specialized early intervention services. Tele-intervention – the delivery of early intervention services via telehealth technology - has the potential to meet this need in a cost-effective manner.
Method: Twenty-seven families of infants and toddlers with varying degrees of hearing loss participated in a randomized study, receiving their services primarily through TI or via traditional in-person home visits. Pre- and post-test measures of child outcomes, family and provider statisfaction, and costs were collected.
Results: The TI group scored statistically significantly higher on the expressive language measure than the in-person group (p =.03). A measure of home visit quality revealed that the TI group scored statistically significantly better on the Parent Engagement subscale of the Home Visit Rating Scales-Adapted & Extended (HOVRS-A+; Roggman, et al., 2012). Cost savings associate with providing services via TI increased as the intensity of service delivery increased. Although most providers and families were positive about TI, there was great variability in their perceptions.
Conclusions: Tele-intervention is a promising cost-effective method for delivering high quality early intervention services to families of children who are DHH.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005a). Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice. [Position statement].
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005b). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice. [Position statement].
Behl, D., Houston, K. T., & Stredler-Brown, A. (2012). The value of a learning community to support telepractice for infants and toddlers with hearing loss. Volta Review, 112, 313-296.
Blaiser, K., Edwards, M., Behl, D., & Muñoz, K. (2012). Tele-intervention services at Sound Beginnings at Utah State University. Volta Review, 112, 365-372.
Cason, J., Behl, D., & Ringwalt, S. (2012). Overview of states’ use of telehealth for the delivery of early intervention (IDEA Part C) services. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 39-46. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2012.6105
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2013). Summary of national CDC 2011 EHDI data. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/ehdi-data2011.html
Hjelm, N. M. (2005). Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11, 60-70.
Hope Publishers. (2004). Language Development Scale. Retrieved from http://www.hopepubl.com
Koehlinger, K., Owen Van Horne, A. J., & Moeller, M. P. (2013). Grammatical outcomes of 3 & 6 year old children with mild to severe hearing loss. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research. Manuscript in preparation.
Mashima, M. & Doarn, C. (2008). Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14, 1101-1117.
McCann, D.C., Worsfold, S., Law, C.M., Mullee, M., Petou, S., Stevenson, J.,… Kennedy, C.R. (2009). Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94, 293-297.
National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management. (2010). NCHAM 2010 Telehealth Survey. Retrieved from http://www.infanthearing.org/telehealth/docs/Telehealth%20Survey%20Summary.pdf
Outcomes of children with hearing loss: A study of children ages birth to six. 2013. Funded by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communicative Disorders grant # DC009560. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa. edu/~ochl.
Roggman, L.A., Cook, G.A., Innocenti, M.S., Jump Norman, V.K., Christiansen, K., Boyce, L. K., … Hallgren, K. (2012). Home Visit Rating Scales—Adapted and Extended (HOVRS-A+). Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
Rosenfeld, M. (2002, October). Report on the ASHA speech-language pathology health care survey. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Scott, R.E., McCarthy, F.G., Jennett, P.A., Perverseff, T., Lorenzetti, D., Saeed, A., … Yeo, M. (2007). Telehealth outcomes: A synthesis of the literature and recommendations for outcome indicators. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13(Suppl)2, 1-38.
Strong, C. J., Clark, T. C., Barringer, D. G., Walden, B. E., & Williams, S. A. (1992). SKI-HI home-based programming for children with hearing impairments: Demographics, child identification, and program effectiveness, 1979-1991. A three-year study conducted at the SKI-HI Institute. Logan, UT: SKI-HI Institute, Utah State University.
Tonelson, S. W. (1980). A validation study of the SKI-HI language development scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. (AAT 8102583)
Toward Equality. (1988). A report to the Congress of the United States: Toward equality- Commission on Education of the Deaf. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vogel, C.A., Boller, K., Xue, Y., Blair, R., Aikens, N., Burwick, A., … Stein, J.. (2011). Learning as we go: A first snapshot of Early Head Start programs, staff, families, and children. Report No. 2011-7. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
White, K. R., (2007). Early intervention for children with permanent hearing loss: Finishing the EHDI revolution. The Volta Review, 106, 237-258.
White K. R., Forsman, I., Eichwald, J., & Muñoz, K. (2010). The evolution of early hearing detection and intervention programs in the United States. Seminars in Perinatology, 34, 170-179.
Wootton, R. (2001). Recent advances: Telemedicine. British Medical Journal, 323, 557-560.
Copyright (c) 2013 Kristina M. Blaiser, Diane Behl, Catherine Callow-Heusser, Karl R. White
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.