The Use of E-supervision to Support Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Students during Student Teaching Practica

Charles H. Carlin, Katie Boarman, Emily Carlin, Karissa Inselmann

Abstract


In the present feasibility study, e-supervision was used to provide university liaison supervision to SLP graduate students enrolled in student teaching practica. Utilizing a mixed methodology approach, interview and survey data were compared in order to identify similarities and differences between face-to-face and e-supervision and guide future practice. Results showed e-supervised graduate students received adequate supervision, feedback, support, and communication. Further, e-supervision provided additional benefits to supervisors, children on the caseload, and universities. Despite the benefits, disadvantages emerged. Implications for future practice and limitations of the study were identified.


References


American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (February, 2007). The Subject is Change: Creating a Vision for the Future Education of Speech-Language Pathologists. Presentation made at the 2007 Speech-Language Pathology Education Summit, New Orleans, Louisiana.

American Speech-Language Hearing Association. (2008). Clinical Supervision in Speech-Language Pathology [Technical Report]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.

Brandoff, R. & Lombardi, R. (2012). Miles apart: Two art therapists’ experiences of distance supervision. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 29(2), 93-96.

Carlin, C. H., Carlin, E.L., Milam, J. L., & Weinberg, T. (2013). E-supervision & e-mentoring: Professional development for current and future professionals. In K. Todd Houston. Telepractice in speech-language pathology. Plural Publishing, Inc.

Carlin, C. H., Milam, J. L., Carlin, E. L., & Owen, A. (2012). Promising practices in e- supervision: Exploring graduate speech-language pathology interns’ perceptions. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 4(2), 25-37.

Conn, S.R., Roberts, R.L., & Powell, B.M. (2009). Attitudes and satisfaction with a hybrid model of counseling supervision. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 298-306.

Dudding, C. C. (2004) Perceptions of the use of videoconferencing for supervision: Differences among graduate clinicians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Dudding, C. C. (2009). Digital videoconferencing applications across disciplines. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 178-182.

Dudding, C. C. & Justice, L. M. (2004). An e-supervision model: Videoconferencing as a clinical training tool. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 145-151.

Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I Steinke. A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Gruenhagen, K., True, J., & McCracken, T. (1999). Using distance education technologies for the supervision of student teachers in remote rural. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 58-65.

Hallett, T. L. (2002). The impact of technology on teaching, clinical practice, and research. The ASHA Leader, 7(11), 4.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Jossey-Bass, CA: San Francisco.

Olson, M. M., Russell, C. S., & White, M. B. (2001). Technological implications for clinical supervision and practice, The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 201-215.

Robinson, T., Creaghead, C., Hooper, C., Watson, J., & McNeilly, L. (2007). Speech-language pathology Education Summit proceedings. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

Watson, J. C. (2003). Implementing computer technology into the delivery of counseling supervision. Journal of Technology in Supervision, 3(1).

Wood, J. A., Miller, T. W., & Hargrove, D.S. (2005). Clinical supervision in rural settings: A telehealth model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 173-179.

Yusko, B. P. (2004). Caring communities as tools for learner-centered supervision. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 53-72.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2013.6128

  

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.