The Use of E-supervision to Support Speech-Language Pathology Graduate Students during Student Teaching Practica

Charles H. Carlin, Katie Boarman, Emily Carlin, Karissa Inselmann


In the present feasibility study, e-supervision was used to provide university liaison supervision to SLP graduate students enrolled in student teaching practica. Utilizing a mixed methodology approach, interview and survey data were compared in order to identify similarities and differences between face-to-face and e-supervision and guide future practice. Results showed e-supervised graduate students received adequate supervision, feedback, support, and communication. Further, e-supervision provided additional benefits to supervisors, children on the caseload, and universities. Despite the benefits, disadvantages emerged. Implications for future practice and limitations of the study were identified.


American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (February, 2007). The Subject is Change: Creating a Vision for the Future Education of Speech-Language Pathologists. Presentation made at the 2007 Speech-Language Pathology Education Summit, New Orleans, Louisiana.

American Speech-Language Hearing Association. (2008). Clinical Supervision in Speech-Language Pathology [Technical Report]. Available from

Brandoff, R. & Lombardi, R. (2012). Miles apart: Two art therapists’ experiences of distance supervision. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 29(2), 93-96.

Carlin, C. H., Carlin, E.L., Milam, J. L., & Weinberg, T. (2013). E-supervision & e-mentoring: Professional development for current and future professionals. In K. Todd Houston. Telepractice in speech-language pathology. Plural Publishing, Inc.

Carlin, C. H., Milam, J. L., Carlin, E. L., & Owen, A. (2012). Promising practices in e- supervision: Exploring graduate speech-language pathology interns’ perceptions. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 4(2), 25-37.

Conn, S.R., Roberts, R.L., & Powell, B.M. (2009). Attitudes and satisfaction with a hybrid model of counseling supervision. Educational Technology & Society, 12, 298-306.

Dudding, C. C. (2004) Perceptions of the use of videoconferencing for supervision: Differences among graduate clinicians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Dudding, C. C. (2009). Digital videoconferencing applications across disciplines. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 178-182.

Dudding, C. C. & Justice, L. M. (2004). An e-supervision model: Videoconferencing as a clinical training tool. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 145-151.

Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I Steinke. A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

Gruenhagen, K., True, J., & McCracken, T. (1999). Using distance education technologies for the supervision of student teachers in remote rural. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18(3/4), 58-65.

Hallett, T. L. (2002). The impact of technology on teaching, clinical practice, and research. The ASHA Leader, 7(11), 4.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Jossey-Bass, CA: San Francisco.

Olson, M. M., Russell, C. S., & White, M. B. (2001). Technological implications for clinical supervision and practice, The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 201-215.

Robinson, T., Creaghead, C., Hooper, C., Watson, J., & McNeilly, L. (2007). Speech-language pathology Education Summit proceedings. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

Watson, J. C. (2003). Implementing computer technology into the delivery of counseling supervision. Journal of Technology in Supervision, 3(1).

Wood, J. A., Miller, T. W., & Hargrove, D.S. (2005). Clinical supervision in rural settings: A telehealth model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 173-179.

Yusko, B. P. (2004). Caring communities as tools for learner-centered supervision. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 53-72.




  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2013 Charles H. Carlin, Katie Boarman, Emily Carlin, Karissa Inselmann

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.