Lessons Learned in Pilot Testing Specialty Consultations to Benefit Individuals with Lower Limb Loss

Christine Elnitsky, Gail Latlief, Deborah Gavin-Dreschnack, Melanie Harris, Robert Campbell


Telerehabilitation technologies enable the delivery of rehabilitation services from providers to people with disabilities as well as specialty care consultations. This article discusses the barriers experienced when planning and pilot testing a telerehabilitation multi-site specialty consultation for specialists in their medical centers, and the lessons learned. The barriers included integration and participation, coordination across organizational units, and privacy and information security. Lessons learned included the need for collaboration across multiple departments, telerehabilitation equipment back-ups, and anonymous and private communication protocols. Despite delays resulting from coordination at multiple levels of a national organization, we developed a program plan and successfully implemented a pilot test of the southeast region program.  Specialty consultation using telerehabilitation delivery methods requires identifying provider preferences for technological features. Lessons learned could inform development of outpatient telerehabilitation for patients with amputations and studies of patients and providers involved in telerehabilitation.


American Telemedicine Association. (2010). A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.americantelemed.org/files/public/standards/ATA%20Telerehab%20Guidelines%20v1%20(2).pdf

Arora, S., Geppert, C.M., Kalishman. S., Dion. D., Pullara, F., Bjeletich, B.,…Scaletti, J.V. (2007). Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Academic Medicine, 82, 154-160.

Arora, S., Kalishman, S., Dion, D., Som, D., Thornton, K., Bankhurst, A.,…Yutzy S. (2011). Partnering urban academic medical centers and rural primary care clinicians to provide complex chronic disease care. Health Affairs, 30, 1176- 1184.

Barrett, M., Larson, A., Carville, K., & Ellis, I. (2009). Challenges faced in implementation of a telehealth enabled chronic wound care system. Rural Remote Health, 9(3), 1154. Retrieved from http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=1154

Bendixen, R.M., Levy, C., Lutz, B.J., Horn, K.R., Chronister, K., & Mann, W.C. (2008). A telerehabilitation model for victims of polytrauma. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal, 33, 215-220.

Chumbler, N.R., Rose, D.K., Griffiths, P., Quigley, P., McGee-Hernandez, N., Carlson, K.A., …Hoenig H. (2010). Study protocol: Home-based telehealth stroke care: A randomized trial for veterans. Trials,11, 74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-74

Chumbler, N.R., Quigley, P., Sanford, J., Griffiths, P., Rose, D., Morey, M., …Hoenig, H. (2010). Implementing telerehabilitation research for stroke rehabilitation with community dwelling veterans: Lessons learned. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 2(1), 15-21.

Currell, R., Urquhart, C., Wainwright, P., & Lewis, R. (2000, January 20). Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, (2): doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002098

Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011a). DVA Volume II Medical programs and Information Technology Programs, Congressional Submission, FY2012 Funding and FY2013 Advance Appropriations Request. Washington D.C.: DVA.

Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011b). Strategic plan refresh fiscal year (FY) 2011-2015. Washington, D.C.: DVA. Retrieved from http://www.va.gov/VA_2011-2015_Strategic_Plan_Refresh_wv.pdf

Dorstyn, D.S., Mathias, J.L., & Denson, L.A. (2011). Psychosocial outcomes of telephone- based counseling for adults with an acquired physical disability: A meta-analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1037/a0022249

Ekeland, A.E., Bowes, A., & Flottorp, S. (2010).

Effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 736-771.

Hoenig, H., Sanford, J.A., Butterfield, T., Griffiths, P.C., Richardson, P., & Hargaves, K. (2006). Development of teletechnology protocol for in-home rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 43, 287-298.

Institute of Medicine . (2001). Crossing the quality chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kulpers, P., Foster, M., Smith, S., & Fleming, J. (2009). Using ICF-environment factors to enhance the continuum of outpatient ABI rehabilitation: An exploratory study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 144-151. doi:10.1080/01674820701817938.

Legg, L., & Langhorn, P. (2004). Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: A systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet, 363, 352-356.

May, C.R., Williams, T.L., Mair, F.S., Mort, M.M., Shaw, N.T., & Gask, L. (2002). Factors influencing the evaluation of telehealth interventions: preliminary results from a qualitative study of evaluation projects in the UK. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 8(Suppl 2), 65-67.doi:10.1258/jtt.2012.120219.

McCue, M., Fairman, A., & Pramuka, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 195-205.

Rintala, D.H., Krouskop, T.A., Wright, J.V., Garber, S.L., Frnka, J., Henson, H.K.,… Monga, T.N. (2004). Telerehabilitation for veterans with a lower-limb amputation or ulcer: Technical acceptability of data. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41, 481-490.

Vladek, B.C., Miller, N.A., & Clausen, S.B. (1993). The changing face of long-term care. Health Care Finance Review, 14(4), 5-23.

World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2012.6097



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2012 Christine Elnitsky, Gail Latlief, Deborah Gavin-Dreschnack, Melanie Harris, Robert Campbell

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.