A Pilot Investigation of Speech Sound Disorder Intervention Delivered by Telehealth to School-Age Children
This article describes a school-based telehealth service delivery model and reports outcomes made by school-age students with speech sound disorders in a rural Ohio school district. Speech therapy using computer-based speech sound intervention materials was provided either by live interactive videoconferencing (telehealth), or conventional side-by-side intervention. Progress was measured using pre- and post-intervention scores on the Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation-2 (Goldman & Fristoe, 2002). Students in both service delivery models made significant improvements in speech sound production, with students in the telehealth condition demonstrating greater mastery of their Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals. Live interactive videoconferencing thus appears to be a viable method for delivering intervention for speech sound disorders to children in a rural, public school setting.
Keywords: Telehealth, telerehabilitation, videoconferencing, speech sound disorder, speech therapy, speech-language pathology; E-Helper
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2008). National Outcomes Measurement Scales K-12, 2008 National Data Report. Retrieved June 24, 2009 from www.asha.org.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: position statement [position statement]. Available from http://www.asha.org/docs/ html/PS2005-00116.html
Boswell, S. (2007, March 6). Ohio grant addresses personnel shortage: Innovative strategies meet short-and long-term goals. The ASHA Leader, 2 (3)1, 14-15.
Christmann, E. & Badgett, J. (2003). A meta-analytic comparison of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on elementary students’ academic achievement. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 91-104.
Forducey, P. (2006, August 15). Speech telepractice program expands options for rural Oklahoma schools. The ASHA Leader, 11(10), 12-13.
Gierut, J. (1998). Treatment efficacy: Functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, s85-s100.
Goldman, R. & Fristoe, M. (2002). The Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.
Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R., Rowan, L.E. & Creaghead, N. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech-language intervention provided by telehealth and traditional side-by-side intervention. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(3), 134-139.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). Section 800 [c]8. Retrieved July 8, 2009, from http://idea.ed.gov.
Justice, L.M., & Fey, M.E. (2004, September 21). Evidence-based practice in schools: Integrating craft and Theory with science and data. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved February 15, 2011 from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2004/040921/f040921a.htm.
Lewis, C., Packman, A., Onslow, M., Simpson, J., & Jones, M. (2008). A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of early Stuttering Intervention. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 17, 139-149.
Madsen, L., & Shellsey, R. (2005, November). Using teleintervention to address the slp shortage in North Dakota. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech Language Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
Masterson, J. (1995). Future directions in computer use. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 260-262.
McGuire, R. (1995). Computer based instrumentation: Issues in clinical applications. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 223-231.
Polovoy, C. (2008, July 15). Telepractice in schools helps address personnel shortages. The ASHA Leader, 13(9), 22-24.
Ruscello, D., Yanero, D., & Ghalichebaf, M. (1995). Cooperative service delivery between a university clinic and a school system. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 273- 277.
Shriberg, L., Kwiatkowski, J., & Snyder, T. (1989). Tabletop versus microcomputer-assisted speech management: Stabilization phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 233-248.
Shriberg, L., Kwiatkowski, J., & Snyder, T. (1990). Tabletop versus microcomputer- assisted speech management: Response evocation phase. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 635-655.
Secord, W. (1989). The traditional approach to treatment. In N.A.Creaghead, P.W.Newman & W.A. Secord (Eds.), Assessment and Remediation of Articulation and Phonological Disorders, second edition, (pp.129-157). Columbus, OH:Merrill Publishing Company.
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, D. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4th Edition. San Antonio, Texas: Pearson.
Sutton, G., & Brick, M. (2005). TinyEye Online Speech Therapy [computer software]. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: TinyEYE Therapy Services.
VanDusen, L., & Worthern, B. (1995). Can integrated instructional technology transform the classroom? Educational Leadership, 53, 28-33.
Waite, M., Cahill, L., Theodoros, D., Busuttin, S., & Russell, T. (2006). A pilot study of online assessment of childhood speech disorders. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12 (Suppl.3), 92-24
Waite, M., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., & Cahill, L (2010). Internet-based telehealth assessment of language using the CELF-4. Language-Speech-Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 445-458.
Copyright (c) 2011 Sue Grogan-Johnson, Rodney M. Gabel, Jacquelyn Taylor, Lynne E. Rowan, Robin Alvares, Jason Schenker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.