Telepractice in School-age Children Who Stutter: A Controlled Before and After Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MIDA-SP
Keywords:Fluency, MIDA-Stuttering Program, Stuttering, Telehealth, Telepractice
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a general reorganization of rehabilitation services in Italy. The lockdown in Italy led to the use of telepractice for the delivery of speech therapy, including stuttering. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effectiveness of the MIDA-SP (Tomaiuoli et al., 2012), delivered online for school-age children who stutter. A non-randomized controlled pre- and post-treatment study included an experimental group (11 children) receiving a telepractice adaptation of MIDA-SP and a historical control group (11 children) receiving in-person MIDA-SP. Both groups had been assessed with SSI-4 and OASES-S pre- and post-treatment. No statistically significant differences were found between the two modes of delivery. These findings suggest that MIDA-SP treatment delivered via telepractice is effective for school-age children who stutter.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2019). Telepractice: Overview. https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Telepractice
Bridgman, K., Onslow, M., O'Brian, S., Jones, M., & Block, S. (2016). Lidcombe Program webcam treatment for early stuttering: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 932–939. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0011
Cangi, M. E., & Toğram, B. (2020). Stuttering therapy through telepractice in Turkey: A mixed method study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 66, 105793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105793
Carey, B., O'Brian, S., Lowe, R., & Onslow, M. (2014). Webcam delivery of the Camperdown Program for adolescents who stutter: A phase II trial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_LSHSS-13-0067
Carey, B., O'Brian, S., Onslow, M., Block, S., Jones, M., & Packman, A. (2010). Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of a telehealth treatment for chronic stuttering: The Camperdown Program. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820902763944
Coufal, K., Parham, D., Jakubowitz, M., Howell, C., & Reyes, J. (2018). Comparing traditional service delivery and telepractice for speech sound production using a functional outcome measure. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0070
Covert, L. T., Slevin, J. T., & Hatterman, J. (2018). The effect of telepractice on missed appointment rates. International Journal of Telepractice, 10(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2018.6258
Dancey C.P., Reidy J.G., & Rowe R. (2012). Statistics for the Health Sciences: A Non-Mathematical Introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Davidow, J. H., Grossman, H. L., & Edge, R. L. (2019). Stuttering frequency, speech rate, speech naturalness, and speech effort during the production of voluntary stuttering. Language and Speech, 62(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918766962
Eslami Jahromi, M., Ahmadian, L., & Bahaadinbeigy, K. (2020). The effect of tele-speech therapy on treatment of stuttering. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1–6. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1754475
Kully D. (2000). Telehealth in speech pathology: Applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(Suppl 2), S39–S41. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633001935509
Lowe, R., O'Brian, S., & Onslow, M. (2013). Review of telehealth stuttering management. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 65(5), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357708
Ludwig, S., & Zarbock, A. (2020). Coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2: A brief overview. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 131(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004845
O’Brian, S., Carey B., Lowe R., Onslow M., Packman. A., & Cream A. (2018). The Camperdown Program Stuttering Treatment Guide. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/2018-10/Camperdown%20Program%20Treatment%20Guide%20June%202018.pdf
Onslow, M., & Millard, S. (2012). Palin Parent Child Interaction and the Lidcombe Program: Clarifying some issues. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.10.002
Onslow, M., Packman, A. & Harrison, E. (2003). The Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. A clinician’s guide. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
Riley, G.D., (2009). Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults (SSI-4) 4th Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
Sheehan, J. G. (1970). Stuttering: Research and therapy. Harper & Row.
Tindall, L. R., Huebner, R. A., Stemple, J. C., & Kleinert, H. L. (2008). Videophone-delivered voice therapy: A comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson's disease. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 14(10), 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2008.0040
Tomaiuoli, D., Del Gado, F., Lucchini, E., & Spinetti, M.G. (2012). A multidimensional, integrated, differentiated, art-mediated stuttering programme, by Jelcic Jaksic, S., & Onslow, M. Science and Practice of Stuttering Treatment: A Symposium. New York, Wiley and Sons.
Valentine D. T. (2015). Stuttering intervention in three service delivery models (direct, hybrid, and telepractice): Two case studies. International Journal of Telepractice, 6(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2014.6154
Weidner, K., & Lowman, J. (2020). Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: A systematic review. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(1), 326–338.https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_PERSP-19-00146
Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2006). Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31(2), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.02.002
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.