Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6303

Keywords:

Client satisfaction, Occupational therapy, Patient preference, Patient satisfaction, Physical therapy, Remote, Rural, Speech-language therapy, Telehealth, Telemedicine

Abstract

Telehealth provides health care services to clients through telecommunications. Rehabilitation services such as occupational therapy, physical therapy, and speech-language therapy can be delivered via telehealth. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ reports of their satisfaction with telehealth compared to standard in-person therapy for patients living in rural areas. Four databases were utilized for this systematic review. The following words were searched: telehealth, rural, and patient satisfaction. Abstract searches identified 251 articles, and 55 were read in full text. Four articles met inclusion criteria. There was high satisfaction for patients in all studies regarding the use of telehealth. Findings showed that overall, telehealth supported increased rates of patient satisfaction for OT, PT, and SLP services delivered to rural communities.

  

Author Biographies

Loriana C. Harkey, Creighton University

Occupational Therapy Student

Sadie M. Jung, Creighton University

Occupational Therapy Student

Elizabeth R Newton, Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions

Occupational Therapy Student

Angela Patterson, Creighton University

Professor at Creighton University and OTD, OTR/L

References

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2010). Telerehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), S92-S102. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.64S92

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2013). Telehealth [Position paper]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(6), S69-S90. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.67S69

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2017). Guidelines for systematic reviews. Retrieved from https://ajot.submit2aota.org/journals/ajot/forms/systematic_reviews.pdf

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2018). Telehealth in Occupational Therapy [Position paper]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(Supplement_2), 7212410059. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.72S219

American Physical Therapy Association. (2019). Telehealth. Retrieved from http://www.apta.org/telehealth/

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Australia's health 2018. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/0c0bc98b-5e4d-4826-af7f-b300731fb447/aihw-aus-221-chapter-5-2.pdf.aspx

Balestra, M. (2018). Telehealth and legal implications for nurse practitioners. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 14(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.10.003

Bagchi, A. D., Melamed, B., Yeniyurt, S., Holzemer, W., & Reyes, D. (2018). Telemedicine delivery for urban seniors with low computer literacy: A pilot study. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 22(2), 11–1. https://www.himss.org/library/telemedicine-delivery-urban-seniors-low-computer-literacy-pilot-study

Betts, S., Feichter, L., Kleinig, Z., O'Connell-Debais, A., Thai, H., Wong, C., & Kumar, S. (2018). Telerehabilitation versus standard care for improving cognitive function and quality of life for adults with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences & Practice, 16(3), 1-16.

Breeden, L. (2016). Occupational therapy home safety intervention via telehealth. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 8(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2016.6183

Cady, R. G., & Finkelstein, S. M. (2014). Task-technology fit of video telehealth for nurses in an outpatient clinic setting. Telemedicine and e-Health, 20(7), 633-639. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0242

Cary, M. P., Jr, Spencer, M., Carroll, A., Hand, D. H., Amis, K., Karan, E., Cannon, R. F., Morgan, M. S., & Hoenig, H. M. (2016). Benefits and challenges of delivering tele-rehabilitation services to rural veterans. Home Healthcare Now, 34(8), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000441

Chedid R., Dew A., & Veitch C. (2013). Barriers to the use of information and communication technology by occupational therapists working in a rural area of New South Wales, Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12016

Cottrell, M., Galea, O., O’Leary, S., Hill, A., & Russell, T. (2017). Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516645148

Desko, L., & Nazario, M. (2014). Evaluation of a clinical video telehealth pain management clinic. Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy, 28(4), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.3109/15360288.2014.969875

Flanagan, T. (2018). Telehealth: The 2018 predicted dramatic rise in popularity. Retrieved from http://www.hcrnetwork.com/telehealth-2018-predicted-dramatic-rise-popularity/

Grogan-Johnson, S., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Creaghead, N. (2010). A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(3), 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090608

Hall, N., Boisvert, M., & Steele, R. (2013). Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: A systematic review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 5(1), 27-38. https://doi:org/10.5195/ijt.2013.6119

Hall, F., Gordon, S., Hulcombe, J., & Stephens, C. (2019). Compression garment service model: Facilitating access to compression garments through workforce and service redesign. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 27(3), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12509

Health Resources & Service Administration. (2018). Defining rural population. Retrieved from https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/definition/index.html

Hung, G., & Fong, K. (2019). Effects of telerehabilitation in occupational therapy practice: A systematic review. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy 32(1), 3-21. https://doi.10.1177/1569186119849119

Jacobs, K., Cason, J., & McCullough, A. (2015). The process for the formulation of the international telehealth position statement for occupational therapy. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 7(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2015.6163

Koivunen, M., & Saranto, K. (2018). Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12445

Lade, H., McKenzie, S., Steele, L., & Russell, T. G. (2012). Validity and reliability of the assessment and diagnosis of musculoskeletal elbow disorders using telerehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18(7), 413–418.

https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2012.120501

Levy, C. E., Silverman, E., Huanguang Jia, Geiss, M., & Omura, D. (2015). Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 52(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0239

Linder, S. M., Rosenfeldt, A. B., Bay, R. C., Sahu, K., Wolf, S. L., & Alberts, J. L. (2015). Improving quality of life and depression after stroke through telerehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 6902290020. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.014498

McWilliams, T., Hendricks, J., Twigg, D., Wood, F., & Giles, M. (2016). Telehealth for paediatric burn patients in rural areas: A retrospective audit of activity and cost savings. Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 42(7), 1487-1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.03.001

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

Parker, S., Prince, A., Thomas, L., Song, H., & Milosevic, D. (2018). Electronic, mobile and telehealth tools for vulnerable patients with chronic disease: A systematic review and realist synthesis. British Medical Journal Open, 8(8), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019192

Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Prakash B. (2010). Patient satisfaction. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 3(3), 151-155.

Russell, T.G., Blumke, R., Richardson, B.R., & Truter, P. (2010). Telerehabilitation mediated physiotherapy assessment of ankle disorders. Physiotherapy Research International, 15(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.471

Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M., Muir Gray, J.A., Haynes, R.B. & Richardson, W.S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.

Sangelaji, B., Smith, C., Paul, L., Treharne, G., & Hale, L. (2017). Promoting physical activity engagement for people with multiple sclerosis living in rural settings: A proof-of-concept case study. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 19, 17-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2017.138130

Solovieva, T. I., & Walls, R. T. (2014). Barriers to traumatic brain injury services and supports in rural setting. (Report). Journal of Rehabilitation, 80(4), 10-18.

Tan, K.K., Narayanan, A.S., Koh, G., Kyaw, K.K., & Hoenig, H.M. (2014). Development of telerehabilitation application with designated consultation categories. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51 9, 1383-1396. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0052

Trading Economics. (2019a). China - rural population. Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/china/rural-population-percent-of-total-population-wb-data.html

Trading Economics. (2019b). India, rural population. Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/india/rural-population-percent-of-total-population-wb-data.html

United States Department of Health and Human Services: Health Resources and Service Administration. (n.d.). National Center for Health Workforce Analysis: Distribution of U.S. health care providers residing in rural and urban areas. Retrieved from https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/assets/1275-5131/rural-urban-workforce-distribution-nchwa-2014.pdf

Van Dis, J. (2002). Where we live: Health care in rural vs urban America. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(1), 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.1.108-JMS0102-2-1

Worboys, T., Brassington, M., Ward, E. C., & Cornwell, P. L. (2018). Delivering occupational therapy hand assessment and treatment sessions via telehealth. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17691861

World Bank. (2018). Rural population: (% of total population). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS

Xesfingi, S., & Vozikis, A. (2016). Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: Assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 16, 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1327-4

Downloads

Published

2020-12-08

How to Cite

Harkey, L. C., Jung, S. M., Newton, E. R., & Patterson, A. (2020). Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 12(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2020.6303

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Clinical Research

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.