The Effect of Telerehabilitation on Missed Appointment Rates


  • Lyn T. Covert Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, KY University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY
  • John T. Slevin Department of Neurology, college of Medicine, University of Kentucky Department of Veterans Affaris Medical Center, Lexington, KY
  • Jessica Hatterman Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, KY



The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of telerehabilitation on missed appointment rates in a rehabilitation clinic.  Clients fail to attend scheduled appointments for a variety of reasons.  Unmet appointments represent a loss of financial support as well as diminished efficiency and capacity to provide services. Speech therapy utilizing multiple appointments is most difficult to maintain during a treatment regimen. This may cause individuals to miss appointments and therefore not achieve desired results.  For this study, researchers utilized an intense speech therapy technique, the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT®) to measure compliance with scheduled appointments. Participants were randomized to either in-person treatment or telerehabilitation treatment at a site distant from the speech-language pathologist. Participants in the telerehabilitation (TR) condition completed significantly more appointments than participants in the in-person (IP) condition. When comparing results of treatment for each condition, there were no significant differences in outcome whether treated in the IP or TR condition of the study for monologue and picture description tasks, which are closely associated with conversational speech.  There was a difference in the reading task with participants demonstrating significantly better post treatment results in the IP condition.  The reason for this disparity is unclear and warrants further study.


Author Biography

Lyn T. Covert, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, KY University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY

Lyn Covert is currently assigned to the Research Service at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Lexington, KY as a researcher.  She is also an adjunct instructor at the University of Kentucky and a university supervisor at Eastern Kentucky University.


American Telemedicine Association (2017). Principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. Retrieved from

Berg, B.P., Murr, M., Chermak, D., Woodall, J., Pignone, M., Sandler, R.S., & Denton, B. L. (2013). Estimating the cost of no-shows and the effects of mitigation strategies. Medical Decision Making, 33, 976-985. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13478194

Critchley, E. (1981). Speech disorders of Parkinsonism: A review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 44, 751-758. Retrieved from

Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1969a). Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 246-269. Retrieved from

Darley, F., Aronson, A., & Brown, J. (1969b). Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 462-469. Retrieved from

DuMontier, C., Rindfleisch, K., Pruszynski, J., & Frey III, J. (2013). A multi-method intervention to reduce no-shows in an urban residency clinic. Family Medicine, 45, 634–641. Retrieved from

Fahn, S., Marsden, G., Goldstein, M., & Caline, D. (1987). Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease (Vol 2). Florham Park, NJ: Macmillian Healthcare Information. Retrieved from

Fox, C., Ebersbach, G., Ramig, L. & Sapir, S. (2012). LSVT® LOUD and LSVT® BIG: Behavioral treatment programs for speech and body movement in Parkinson disease. Parkinson’s Disease, 1-13. doi:10.1155/2012/391946. Retrieved from

Georgeadis A, Brennan D., Barker L, & Baron C. (2004). Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology, 18, 639–652. doi:10.1080/02687030444000075

Hill, A., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., Cahill, L., Ward, E., & Clark, K. (2006). An Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders. A pilot study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 45-56. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/006)

Keck, C. & Doarn, C. (2014).Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology. Telemedicine Journal & eHealth, 20, 635-639. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0295

Kully D. (2000). Telehealth in speech patholgoy: Applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6(Suppl 2), 39–41. Retrieved from

Lemaire E, Boudrias Y, & Greene G. (2001).Low-bandwidth, Internet-based videoconferencing for physical rehabilitation consultations. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 7, 82–89. Retrieved from

OpenDataNetwork.(2016). Retrieved from

Paulson, H., & Stern, M.B. (1997). Clinical manifestations of Parkinson’s disease. In R. Watt & Koller (Eds.) Movement Disorders: Neurological Principles and Practice. (pp.183-197). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ramig, L.O., Countryman, S., Thompson, L.L., & Horii Y. (1995). Comparison of two forms of intensive speech treatment for Parkinson disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1232–1251. Retrieved from

Ramig, L., Sapir, S., Fox, C., & Countryman, S. (2001). Changes in vocal intensity following intensive voice treatment (LSVT®) in individuals with Parkinson disease: A comparison with untreated patients and normal age-matched controls. Movement Disorders, 16, 79-83.

Scheideman-Miller C., Clark P., Smeltzer, S., Cloud, A., Carpenter, J., Hodge, B., & Prouty, D. (2002). Two year results of a pilot study delivering speech therapy to students in a rural Oklahoma school via telemedicine. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Sicotte, C., Lehoux, P., Fortier-Blanc, J., & Leblanc, Y. (2003). Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, 253–258. doi: 10.1258/135763303769211256

Spielman, J., Ramig, L., Halpern, A., & Gavin, W. (2007). Effects of an extended version of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment on voice and speech in Parkinson’s disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 96-107. doi: 10.1044/1058- 0360(2007/014)

Stroud, A., & Belin, G. (2004, November). Effects of intensive voice treatment (LSVT®) on ataxic and hypokinetic dysarthria: A condition case study. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.

Theodoros, D.G., Constantinescu, G., Russell, T., Ward, E.C., Wilson, S.J., & Wootton, R. (2009). Treating the speech disorder in Parkinson’s disease online. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 12(Suppl 3), 88–91. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090306

Theodoros, D., Hill, A., & Russell, T. (2016).Clinical and quality of life outcomes of speech treatment for Parkinson’s disease delivered to the home via telerehabilitation: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25, 214-232. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0005

Tindall, L. & Huebner, R. (2009).The impact of an application of telerehabilitation technology on caregiver burden. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 1(1), 3-7. Retrieved from

Tindall, L., Huebner, R., Stemple, J., & Kleinert, H. (2008).Videophone-delivered voice therapy: A comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson’s disease. Telemedicine Journal & eHealth, 14, 1070-1077. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0040.

Van Den Eeden, S.,Tanner, C., Bernstein, A., Fross, R., Leimpeter, A., Bloch, D., Nelson, L.M. (2003). Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: Variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 1015-1022. Retrieved from

Wikimedia Commons. (2010).

Wohlert, A. (2004). Service delivery variables and outcomes of treatment for hypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 12, 235-239. Retrieved from



How to Cite

Covert, L. T., Slevin, J. T., & Hatterman, J. (2018). The Effect of Telerehabilitation on Missed Appointment Rates. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 10(2), 65–72.



Clinical Applications