Case Studies in Physical Therapy: Transitioning a "Hands-On" Approach into a Virtual Platform

Authors

  • Aideen Turner Virtual Physical Therapists

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2018.6253

Abstract

Technology is expanding at an unprecedented rate. Because patients value the speed and convenience of the internet, there is an increasing demand for telemedicine.  Practitioners must therefore adapt their clinical skills to evolving online technologies. This paper presents a series of three case studies in which a physical therapist first assessed and treated musculoskeletal disorders via a live, secure video. The basis of the mechanical assessment was observation of movement rather than palpation. In each case, the virtual mechanical assessment identified a specific sub-classification with a directional preference.  All patients reported improvements in symptoms and function in less than four visits and all maintained a reduction in symptoms after three months. Given the “hands-off” role of the evaluator, this approach can become an effective tool in the evolving healthcare platform of telerehabilitation.

 

  

References

Abady, R. O. (2014). Inter-examiner reliability of diplomats in the mechanical diagnosis and therapy system in assessing patients with shoulder pain. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 22,199-205.

American Telemedicine Association. (2018, January 6). What is Telemedicine? Retrieved from http://www.americantelemed.org/main/about/about-telemedicine/telemedicine-faqs

AmericanWell. (2017). TeleHealth Index: 2017 Consumer Survey. Retrieved from http://go.americanwell.com/rs/335-QLG-882/images/American_Well_Telehealth_Index_2017_Consumer_Survey.pdf

BCBS. (2018). Telehealth. Retrieved from https://www.bluecrossnc.com/sites/default/files/document/attachment/services/public/pdfs/medicalpolicy/telehealth.pdf#search=telehealth%20Telehealth

Cigna. (2016, September). Telehealth. Retrieved from https://www.cigna.com/assets/docs/individual-and-families/2017/medical/898764-cigna-telehealth-connection-flyer.pdf

Clare, A. M. (2005). Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 28,122-127.

Deloitte Development LLC. (2016). What Matters Most to the Healthcare Consumer. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/us-lshc-cx-survey-pov-provider-paper.pdf

Fritz, D. V. (2000). Interrater reliability of judgements of the centralization phenomenon and status change during movement testing in patients with low back pain, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(1), 57-61.

Kilpikoski, A. K. (2002). Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method. Spine, 27, 207-214.

Landi, H. (2018, April 2). News. Retrieved from https://www.healthcare-informatics.com/news-item/telemedicine/report-telehealth-market-estimated-reach-195b-2025

Managed Healthcare Executive. (2015, May 15). Technology. Retrieved from http://www.managedhealthcareexecutive.com/managed-healthcare-executive/news/unitedhealthcare-expanding-telemedicine-reach-20-million-members

May, R. (2009). The McKenzie classification system in extremities: a reliability study using McKenzie assessment forms and experienced clinicians. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 32, 556-563.

McKenzie Institute International. (2018). About Us. Retrieved from http://www.mckenzieinstitute.org/:

McKenzie, M. (2003). The human extremities: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Wellington, New Zealand: Spinal Publications.

McKenzie, R. (1981). The lumbar spine: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy. Wellington, New Zealand: Spinal Publications.

McKenzie, R. (1990). Mechanical diagnosis and therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications.

Medicaid. (2017, January 13). Benefits. Retrieved from https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/telemed/index.html

Rajda, M. M. (2017, January 30). News & analysis. Retrieved from https://news.aetna.com/2015/08/four-ways-telemedicine-will-open-a-whole-new-world-of-health-care/

Razmjou, K. Y. (2000). Intertester reliability of the McKenzie evaluation in assessing patients with mechanical low-back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 30, 368-389.

Reardon, M. (2018, January 8). News. Retrieved from https://www.cnet.com/news/trump-pushes-for-more-broadband-in-rural-areas/

Takasaki, O. R. (2017). Inter-examiner classification reliability of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for extremity problems - Systematic review. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 27, 78-84.

UnitedHealthcare. (2017, January 13). Telemedicine. Retrieved from https://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/ccmcontent/ProviderII/UHC/en-US/Assets/ProviderStaticFiles/ProviderStaticFilesPdf/Tools%20and%20Resources/Policies%20and%20Protocols/UnitedHealthcare%20Medicare%20Coverage/Telehealth_and_Telemedicine_UHCMA_CS.pdf.

Willis, R. R. (2017). Inter-rater reliability of the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in the examination of the knee. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 25(2), 83-90

Downloads

Published

2018-08-03

How to Cite

Turner, A. (2018). Case Studies in Physical Therapy: Transitioning a "Hands-On" Approach into a Virtual Platform. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 10(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2018.6253

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Case Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.