Results of a Survey Offering Clinical Insights into Speech-Language Pathology Telepractice Methods

Authors

  • Elizabeth U. Grillo Department of Communication Sciences And Disorders, West Chester, PA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6230

Abstract

A telepractice survey was administered to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Special Interest Group 18 Telepractice affiliates and attendees of the Waldo County General Hospital Speech-Language Pathology Telepractice Training program in Maine, USA over the summer of 2016.   Sixty-seven respondents completed the survey.  The survey explored demographics of clients and clinicians, costs and equipment, learning opportunities, use of the client’s environment and caregivers/e-helpers, and method adaptations in telepractice.  The results of the survey provide information on the current state of telepractice methods in speech-language pathology from experienced practitioners.  This information may be used to develop telepractice models and to prepare speech-language pathology graduate students in the delivery of telepractice methods.

 Keywords: eHealth, Telehealth, Telemedicine, Telepractice

  

Author Biography

Elizabeth U. Grillo, Department of Communication Sciences And Disorders, West Chester, PA

Associate Professor, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders

References

Administration on Aging (2014). Aging statistics. Retrieved from http://www.aoa.gov/Aging_Statistics/

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Survey report on telepractice use among audiologists and speech-language pathologists. Available at www.asha.org

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). 2016 SIG 18 telepractice services survey results. Available from www.asha.org.

Carlin, C. H. (2012). The use of e-supervision for graduate students who are enrolled in student teaching practicum. Unpublished manuscript.

Cason J. & Cohn, E.R. (2014). Telepractice: An overview and best practices. SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 4-17. https://doi:10.1044/aac23.1.4

Dudding, C. C. (2006). Distance supervision: An update. Perspectives on Administration and Supervision, 16(1), 16–18.

Dudding, C. C. (2004). Perceptions of the use of videoconferencing for supervision: Differences among graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia).

Dudding, C. C., & Justice, L. (2004). A model for e-supervision: Videoconferencing as a clinical training tool. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401040250030501

Grogan-Johnson, S., Meehan, R., McCormick, K., & Miller, N. (2015). Results of a national survey of preservice telepractice training in graduate speech-language pathology and audiology programs. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 42, 122-137.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (1996). Public Law 104-191, 104th United States Congress, August 21, 1996.

McCue, M., Fairman, A., & Pramuka, M. (2010). Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.005

Pickering, M., McAllister, L., Hagler, P., Whitehill, T.L., Penn, C., Robertson, S.J., & McCready, V. (1998). External factors influencing the profession in six societies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 5-17. https://doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0704.05

World Health Organization (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO.

Published

2017-11-20

How to Cite

Grillo, E. U. (2017). Results of a Survey Offering Clinical Insights into Speech-Language Pathology Telepractice Methods. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 9(2), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6230

Issue

Section

Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)